Kritisk læsning af systematiske oversigtsartikler

Translated title of the contribution: Critical reading of systematic review articles

David Ruben Teindl Laursen*, Stig Brorson, Andreas Lundh, Ann Merete Møller, Camilla Hansen Nejstgaard, Jacob Rosenberg, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A systematic review provides an overview of primary studies investigating a given research question, e.g., the effect of a certain treatment. Individual study results are sometimes synthesised in a meta-analysis. A critical reader should consider whether the systematic review is relevant and reliable, e.g., does it follow a protocol, address the risk of bias, and consider potential heterogeneity. PRISMA 2020 guideline recommends a minimum set of items that should be reported in a systematic review article, and AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS are tools for critical appraisal of systematic reviews.

Translated title of the contributionCritical reading of systematic review articles
Original languageDanish
Article numberV09230616
JournalUgeskrift for Laeger
Volume186
Issue number12
ISSN0041-5782
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10. Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critical reading of systematic review articles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this