Kritisk læsning af kliniske retningslinjer

Translated title of the contribution: Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines

Jeppe Benneskou Schroll*, Britta Tendal Jeppesen, Morten Hylander Møller, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Markus Fally, Stig Brorson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ten questions to assess to what degree a clinical practice guideline is likely to be trustworthy: 1) Do the authors have conflicts of interests? 2) Is the clinical question relevant? 3) Have relevant stakeholders been involved? 4) Have methods for study selection been described? 5) Is there a link between evidence and recommendations (transparent methods)? 6) Has the certainty of evidence been assessed? 7) Have the methods for reaching recommendations been described? 8) Are the recommendations unambiguous? 9) Are the recommendations relevant in your situation? 10) Is there an implementation strategy?
Translated title of the contributionCritical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines
Original languageDanish
Article numberV09230579
JournalUgeskrift for Læger
Volume186
Issue number12
ISSN0041-5782
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10. Jun 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this