Research output per year
Research output per year
Ann Starbæk Bager, Lone Hersted, Ottar Ness
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
In this article, we introduce volume two of our themed issue on co-creation and co-production and discuss various basic assumptions related to collaborative research. In collaborative studies in general, dialogue is often highlighted as an important process element with important implications for empowerment for those involved. How-ever, the underlying understandings and implications of dialogic practice are seldom examined in depth. We raise a critical reflexive discussion on different approaches to dialogic engagement and present four high-level discourses guiding organizational scholar-ship to discuss crucial differences and similarities. Moreover, we outline seven researcher ideal types that reflect diverse degrees of dialogic engagement. Our aspiration is to provide useful insights, models, and questions that can guide participatory scholars in fos-tering critical awareness of their own position and the sometimes taken-for-granted assumptions guiding their studies.
Translated title of the contribution | Kritisk diskussion af dialogisk engagement og divergerende forskerpositioner i forskning, der involverer co-creation og co-production |
---|---|
Original language | English |
Journal | Academic Quarter |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | Spring |
Pages (from-to) | 4-22 |
ISSN | 1904-0008 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2022 |
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review