Critical discussion on dialogic engagement and various researcher positions in research concerning co-creation and co-production

Ann Starbæk Bager, Lone Hersted, Ottar Ness

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this article, we introduce volume two of our themed issue on co-creation and co-production and discuss various basic assumptions related to collaborative research. In collaborative studies in general, dialogue is often highlighted as an important process element with important implications for empowerment for those involved. How-ever, the underlying understandings and implications of dialogic practice are seldom examined in depth. We raise a critical reflexive discussion on different approaches to dialogic engagement and present four high-level discourses guiding organizational scholar-ship to discuss crucial differences and similarities. Moreover, we outline seven researcher ideal types that reflect diverse degrees of dialogic engagement. Our aspiration is to provide useful insights, models, and questions that can guide participatory scholars in fos-tering critical awareness of their own position and the sometimes taken-for-granted assumptions guiding their studies.

    Translated title of the contributionKritisk diskussion af dialogisk engagement og divergerende forskerpositioner i forskning, der involverer co-creation og co-production
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalAcademic Quarter
    Volume24
    Issue numberSpring
    Pages (from-to)4-22
    ISSN1904-0008
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2022

    Keywords

    • co-creation
    • co-production
    • collaborative research
    • critical reflexivity Introduction
    • dialogue

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Critical discussion on dialogic engagement and various researcher positions in research concerning co-creation and co-production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this