Is there a European way of war?

Role conceptions, organizational frames, and the utility of force

P. Vennesson, F. Breuer, Chiara de Franco, U.C. Schroeder

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Europe is the region of the world where the network of security institutions is the densest. Yet, these institutions did not erase differences about conceptions of force employment among European countries and between European countries and the United States. Why have concepts of military power and force employment remained distinct and varied in Europe, and yet, what facilitates their convergence at the European Union level into the ambiguous notion of crisis management? We argue that an important answer to these questions is endogenous to the military: both role conceptions and organizational frames of military institutions are key underlying aspects of the differences at the national level and of the common ground at the European Union level. We examine and compare empirically the role conceptions and organizational frames of the armed forces in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom since the early 1990s.
Original languageEnglish
JournalArmed Forces and Society
Volume35
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)628-645
ISSN0095-327X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

role conception
Military
military
Italy
France
management
European Union

Cite this

@article{0c24c8c9d9344cf29d43df00bcbc7fb4,
title = "Is there a European way of war?: Role conceptions, organizational frames, and the utility of force",
abstract = "Europe is the region of the world where the network of security institutions is the densest. Yet, these institutions did not erase differences about conceptions of force employment among European countries and between European countries and the United States. Why have concepts of military power and force employment remained distinct and varied in Europe, and yet, what facilitates their convergence at the European Union level into the ambiguous notion of crisis management? We argue that an important answer to these questions is endogenous to the military: both role conceptions and organizational frames of military institutions are key underlying aspects of the differences at the national level and of the common ground at the European Union level. We examine and compare empirically the role conceptions and organizational frames of the armed forces in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom since the early 1990s.",
author = "P. Vennesson and F. Breuer and {de Franco}, Chiara and U.C. Schroeder",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/0095327X08317994",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "628--645",
journal = "Armed Forces and Society",
issn = "0095-327X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

Is there a European way of war? Role conceptions, organizational frames, and the utility of force. / Vennesson, P.; Breuer, F.; de Franco, Chiara; Schroeder, U.C.

In: Armed Forces and Society, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2009, p. 628-645.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there a European way of war?

T2 - Role conceptions, organizational frames, and the utility of force

AU - Vennesson, P.

AU - Breuer, F.

AU - de Franco, Chiara

AU - Schroeder, U.C.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Europe is the region of the world where the network of security institutions is the densest. Yet, these institutions did not erase differences about conceptions of force employment among European countries and between European countries and the United States. Why have concepts of military power and force employment remained distinct and varied in Europe, and yet, what facilitates their convergence at the European Union level into the ambiguous notion of crisis management? We argue that an important answer to these questions is endogenous to the military: both role conceptions and organizational frames of military institutions are key underlying aspects of the differences at the national level and of the common ground at the European Union level. We examine and compare empirically the role conceptions and organizational frames of the armed forces in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom since the early 1990s.

AB - Europe is the region of the world where the network of security institutions is the densest. Yet, these institutions did not erase differences about conceptions of force employment among European countries and between European countries and the United States. Why have concepts of military power and force employment remained distinct and varied in Europe, and yet, what facilitates their convergence at the European Union level into the ambiguous notion of crisis management? We argue that an important answer to these questions is endogenous to the military: both role conceptions and organizational frames of military institutions are key underlying aspects of the differences at the national level and of the common ground at the European Union level. We examine and compare empirically the role conceptions and organizational frames of the armed forces in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom since the early 1990s.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69549126739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0095327X08317994

DO - 10.1177/0095327X08317994

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 628

EP - 645

JO - Armed Forces and Society

JF - Armed Forces and Society

SN - 0095-327X

IS - 4

ER -