Abstract
Global studies have found tendencies: traditional culture promotes entrepreneurs' networking in the private sphere, impeding innovation, whereas secular-rational culture facilitates networking in the public sphere, benefiting innovation. This embeddedness is here scrutinised in contrasting societies, China and Denmark. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor has surveyed entrepreneurs in China, Denmark and elsewhere. Analyses reconfirm the global tendencies and show that, China in contrast to Denmark, public sphere networking is sparser, but private sphere networking is denser. Innovation is negatively affected by private sphere networking and positively affected by public sphere networking, but innovation is less promoted by public sphere networking in China than in Denmark.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 1/2 |
Pages (from-to) | 145-167 |
ISSN | 1476-1297 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- firm innovation
- networks
- private sphere
- public sphere
- Innovation systems
- China
- Denmark
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
- GEM
- Networks
- Firm innovation
- National innovation systems
- Private sphere
- Public sphere
- Global entrepreneurship monitor