How did the European Marriage Pattern persist? Social versus familial inheritance: England and Quebec, 1650–1850

Gregory Clark, Neil Cummins, Matthew Curtis*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The European Marriage Pattern (EMP), in place in NW Europe for perhaps 500 years, substantially limited fertility. But how could such limitation persist when some individuals who deviated from the EMP norm had more children? If their children inherited their deviant behaviors, their descendants would quickly become the majority of later generations. This puzzle has two possible solutions. The first is that all those that deviated actually had lower net fertility over multiple generations. We show, however, no fertility penalty to future generations from higher initial fertility. Instead the EMP survived because even though the EMP persisted at the social level, children did not inherit their parents’ individual fertility choices. In the paper we show evidence consistent with lateral, as opposed to vertical, transmission of EMP fertility behaviors.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101383
JournalEconomics and Human Biology
Volume54
Number of pages10
ISSN1570-677X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Demography
  • Economic history
  • European Marriage Pattern
  • Selection pressures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How did the European Marriage Pattern persist? Social versus familial inheritance: England and Quebec, 1650–1850'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this