How Decisions Can Be Organized - and Why It Matters

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Abstract

Recent theoretical advances allow organizational designers and managers to better understand how decision processes can be improved. These advances allow managers to address a number of critical questions about the structure and process of decision making, issues that are relevant for any kind of organization be it social, political, or economic. Can we add another employee somewhere in the decision process to increase economic performance? Can we add or eliminate a channel of communication to raise the quality of decisions? What level of skill is worth paying for when we hire a decision maker? Is it a good idea to push decision makers beyond their current capacity if doing so increases their error rate by five percent? Where does the injection of inexperienced decision makers hurt the least? We describe an organizational design approach that provides answers to such questions, and we offer specific guidelines that managers can use to improve decision making in their organizations.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Organization Design
Volume2
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)41-50
Number of pages10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Managers
Decision maker
Decision process
Decision making
Organizational design
Economics
Employees
Economic performance
Injection
Communication

Keywords

  • organization design
  • decision making
  • organizational performance
  • decision aggregation
  • decision delegation
  • decision rights
  • decision evaluation

Cite this

@article{acb3d559cd3f435a85b986ce0d3003d2,
title = "How Decisions Can Be Organized - and Why It Matters",
abstract = "Recent theoretical advances allow organizational designers and managers to better understand how decision processes can be improved. These advances allow managers to address a number of critical questions about the structure and process of decision making, issues that are relevant for any kind of organization be it social, political, or economic. Can we add another employee somewhere in the decision process to increase economic performance? Can we add or eliminate a channel of communication to raise the quality of decisions? What level of skill is worth paying for when we hire a decision maker? Is it a good idea to push decision makers beyond their current capacity if doing so increases their error rate by five percent? Where does the injection of inexperienced decision makers hurt the least? We describe an organizational design approach that provides answers to such questions, and we offer specific guidelines that managers can use to improve decision making in their organizations.",
keywords = "organization design, decision making, organizational performance, decision aggregation, decision delegation, decision rights, decision evaluation",
author = "Michael Christensen and Thorbj{\o}rn Knudsen",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.7146/jod.8566",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "41--50",
journal = "Journal of Organization Design",
issn = "2245-408X",
publisher = "Organizational Design Community",
number = "3",

}

How Decisions Can Be Organized - and Why It Matters. / Christensen, Michael; Knudsen, Thorbjørn.

In: Journal of Organization Design, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2013, p. 41-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Decisions Can Be Organized - and Why It Matters

AU - Christensen, Michael

AU - Knudsen, Thorbjørn

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Recent theoretical advances allow organizational designers and managers to better understand how decision processes can be improved. These advances allow managers to address a number of critical questions about the structure and process of decision making, issues that are relevant for any kind of organization be it social, political, or economic. Can we add another employee somewhere in the decision process to increase economic performance? Can we add or eliminate a channel of communication to raise the quality of decisions? What level of skill is worth paying for when we hire a decision maker? Is it a good idea to push decision makers beyond their current capacity if doing so increases their error rate by five percent? Where does the injection of inexperienced decision makers hurt the least? We describe an organizational design approach that provides answers to such questions, and we offer specific guidelines that managers can use to improve decision making in their organizations.

AB - Recent theoretical advances allow organizational designers and managers to better understand how decision processes can be improved. These advances allow managers to address a number of critical questions about the structure and process of decision making, issues that are relevant for any kind of organization be it social, political, or economic. Can we add another employee somewhere in the decision process to increase economic performance? Can we add or eliminate a channel of communication to raise the quality of decisions? What level of skill is worth paying for when we hire a decision maker? Is it a good idea to push decision makers beyond their current capacity if doing so increases their error rate by five percent? Where does the injection of inexperienced decision makers hurt the least? We describe an organizational design approach that provides answers to such questions, and we offer specific guidelines that managers can use to improve decision making in their organizations.

KW - organization design

KW - decision making

KW - organizational performance

KW - decision aggregation

KW - decision delegation

KW - decision rights

KW - decision evaluation

U2 - 10.7146/jod.8566

DO - 10.7146/jod.8566

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 41

EP - 50

JO - Journal of Organization Design

JF - Journal of Organization Design

SN - 2245-408X

IS - 3

ER -