Hierarchical decision-making produces persistent differences in learning performance

Thorbjørn Knudsen, Davide Marchiori*, Massimo Warglien

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Human organizations are commonly characterized by a hierarchical chain of command that facilitates division of labor and integration of effort. Higher-level employees set the strategic frame that constrains lower-level employees who carry out the detailed operations serving to implement the strategy. Typically, strategy and operational decisions are carried out by different individuals that act over different timescales and rely on different kinds of information. We hypothesize that when such decision processes are hierarchically distributed among different individuals, they produce highly heterogeneous and strongly path-dependent joint learning dynamics. To investigate this, we design laboratory experiments of human dyads facing repeated joint tasks, in which one individual is assigned the role of carrying out strategy decisions and the other operational ones. The experimental behavior generates a puzzling bimodal performance distribution–some pairs learn, some fail to learn after a few periods. We also develop a computational model that mirrors the experimental settings and predicts the heterogeneity of performance by human dyads. Comparison of experimental and simulation data suggests that self-reinforcing dynamics arising from initial choices are sufficient to explain the performance heterogeneity observed experimentally.

Original languageEnglish
Article number15782
JournalScientific Reports
Volume8
Number of pages12
ISSN2045-2322
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25. Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Joints
Theoretical Models

Cite this

@article{ee0268648a7942be8ee9ab0bf4d3d46c,
title = "Hierarchical decision-making produces persistent differences in learning performance",
abstract = "Human organizations are commonly characterized by a hierarchical chain of command that facilitates division of labor and integration of effort. Higher-level employees set the strategic frame that constrains lower-level employees who carry out the detailed operations serving to implement the strategy. Typically, strategy and operational decisions are carried out by different individuals that act over different timescales and rely on different kinds of information. We hypothesize that when such decision processes are hierarchically distributed among different individuals, they produce highly heterogeneous and strongly path-dependent joint learning dynamics. To investigate this, we design laboratory experiments of human dyads facing repeated joint tasks, in which one individual is assigned the role of carrying out strategy decisions and the other operational ones. The experimental behavior generates a puzzling bimodal performance distribution–some pairs learn, some fail to learn after a few periods. We also develop a computational model that mirrors the experimental settings and predicts the heterogeneity of performance by human dyads. Comparison of experimental and simulation data suggests that self-reinforcing dynamics arising from initial choices are sufficient to explain the performance heterogeneity observed experimentally.",
author = "Thorbj{\o}rn Knudsen and Davide Marchiori and Massimo Warglien",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-34128-w",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

Hierarchical decision-making produces persistent differences in learning performance. / Knudsen, Thorbjørn; Marchiori, Davide; Warglien, Massimo.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, 15782, 25.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hierarchical decision-making produces persistent differences in learning performance

AU - Knudsen, Thorbjørn

AU - Marchiori, Davide

AU - Warglien, Massimo

PY - 2018/10/25

Y1 - 2018/10/25

N2 - Human organizations are commonly characterized by a hierarchical chain of command that facilitates division of labor and integration of effort. Higher-level employees set the strategic frame that constrains lower-level employees who carry out the detailed operations serving to implement the strategy. Typically, strategy and operational decisions are carried out by different individuals that act over different timescales and rely on different kinds of information. We hypothesize that when such decision processes are hierarchically distributed among different individuals, they produce highly heterogeneous and strongly path-dependent joint learning dynamics. To investigate this, we design laboratory experiments of human dyads facing repeated joint tasks, in which one individual is assigned the role of carrying out strategy decisions and the other operational ones. The experimental behavior generates a puzzling bimodal performance distribution–some pairs learn, some fail to learn after a few periods. We also develop a computational model that mirrors the experimental settings and predicts the heterogeneity of performance by human dyads. Comparison of experimental and simulation data suggests that self-reinforcing dynamics arising from initial choices are sufficient to explain the performance heterogeneity observed experimentally.

AB - Human organizations are commonly characterized by a hierarchical chain of command that facilitates division of labor and integration of effort. Higher-level employees set the strategic frame that constrains lower-level employees who carry out the detailed operations serving to implement the strategy. Typically, strategy and operational decisions are carried out by different individuals that act over different timescales and rely on different kinds of information. We hypothesize that when such decision processes are hierarchically distributed among different individuals, they produce highly heterogeneous and strongly path-dependent joint learning dynamics. To investigate this, we design laboratory experiments of human dyads facing repeated joint tasks, in which one individual is assigned the role of carrying out strategy decisions and the other operational ones. The experimental behavior generates a puzzling bimodal performance distribution–some pairs learn, some fail to learn after a few periods. We also develop a computational model that mirrors the experimental settings and predicts the heterogeneity of performance by human dyads. Comparison of experimental and simulation data suggests that self-reinforcing dynamics arising from initial choices are sufficient to explain the performance heterogeneity observed experimentally.

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-34128-w

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-34128-w

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

M1 - 15782

ER -