Head-to-head comparison of chest x-ray/head and neck MRI, chest CT/head and neck MRI, and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for detection of distant metastases and synchronous cancer in oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal Cancer

Max Rohde, Anne L Nielsen, Jørgen Johansen, Jens A Sørensen, Nina N. T. T. Nguyen, Anabel Diaz, Mie Kiszka Nielsen, Jon T Asmussen, Janus Mølgaard Christiansen, Oke Gerke, Anders Thomassen, Abass Alavi, Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen, Christian Godballe

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the detection rate of distant metastasis and synchronous cancer, comparing clinically used imaging strategies based on chest x-ray 1 head and neck MRI (CXR/MRI) and chest CT 1 head and neck MRI (CHCT/MRI) with 18F-FDG PET/CT upfront in the diagnostic workup of patients with oral, pharyngeal, or laryngeal cancer. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study based on paired data. Consecutive patients with histologically verified primary head and squamous cell carcinoma at Odense University Hospital from September 2013 to March 2016 were considered for the study. Included patients underwent CXR/MRI and CHCT/MRI as well as PET/CT on the same day and before biopsy. Scans were read masked by separate teams of experienced nuclear physicians or radiologists. The true detection rate of distant metastasis and synchronous cancer was assessed for CXR/MRI, CHCT/MRI, and PET/CT. Results: A total of 307 patients were included. CXR/MRI correctly detected 3 (1%) patients with distant metastasis, CHCT/MRI detected 11 (4%) patients, and PET/CT detected 18 (6%) patients. The absolute differences of 5% and 2%, respectively, were statistically significant in favor of PET/CT. Also, PET/CT correctly detected 25 (8%) synchronous cancers, which was significantly more than CXR/MRI (3 patients, 1%) and CHCT/MRI (6 patients, 2%). The true detection rate of distant metastasis or synchronous cancer with PET/CT was 13% (40 patients), which was significantly higher than 2% (6 patients) for CXR/ MRI and 6% (17 patients) for CHCT/MRI. Conclusion: A clinical imaging strategy based on PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate of distant metastasis or synchronous cancer than strategies in current clinical imaging guidelines, of which European ones primarily recommend CXR/MRI, whereas U.S. guidelines preferably point to CHCT/MRI in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume58
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)1919-1924
ISSN0161-5505
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • Detection rate
  • Distant metastases
  • Synchronous cancer
  • MRI
  • HNSCC
  • PET/CT
  • Prospective Studies
  • Mouth Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Neck/diagnostic imaging
  • Young Adult
  • Head/diagnostic imaging
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiography
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Neoplasm Metastasis/diagnostic imaging
  • Pharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
  • Thorax/diagnostic imaging
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • Aged
  • Cohort Studies
  • Laryngeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Head-to-head comparison of chest x-ray/head and neck MRI, chest CT/head and neck MRI, and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for detection of distant metastases and synchronous cancer in oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this