Growth or stagnation? Farming in England, 1200–1800

Gregory Clark*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Estimates of English income in Broadberry et al.’s British economic growth, 1270–1870 are founded upon a fourfold growth of farm output, and output per farm worker, over this interval. This article shows, using four separate tests, that farm output growth must have been much more limited. The tests are, first, whether in 1300 there was enough work at harvest to employ all the labour force; second, whether the value of output per worker in agriculture was greater than the annual earnings of workers; third, whether the implied relative outputs per acre of arable versus pasture were reasonable; and fourth, whether a much shorter medieval work year was possible. An alternative index of farm output consistent with the labour supply, wages, and farm rents is derived. This shows much less growth during the period 1270–1800. Overall economic growth in England during these years must consequently have been far less than Broadberry et al. estimate.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Economic History Review
Volume71
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)55-81
Number of pages27
ISSN0013-0117
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Economic History Society 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Growth or stagnation? Farming in England, 1200–1800'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this