Getting to 'no': Three ways to jointly accomplish an answer to questions in a questionnaire in doctor–patient interaction

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    74 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper aims to describe the interactional processes through which a medical professional and a patient collaboratively accomplish filling out answers to a questionnaire. Empirical analysis of three different sequences from a video-recorded doctor–patient interaction in which questions of a questionnaire were answered with a ‘no’ reveals three different ways (or methods) in which doctor and patient accomplish this jointly. Applying ethnomethodological conversation analysis (EMCA) as our methodological framework, we conclude that the three interactional practices are fitted in relation to the constraints of the interview that is itself methodically aligned to the practices and organizational structures of the institution, a Danish hospital. Furthermore, we make the case that questionnaires are designed as idealizations of question-answer sequences, and as such do not operate at the same level of detail as the actual question-answer situation. Details that are crucial for the objective of the questionnaire (in this case providing information to a third party) may not be included in the recorded answer. Thus, we argue that in order to understand the informational value of recorded answers in questionnaires, we need to diagnose the interaction in which they were produced, i.e. to critically examine it.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalCommunication & Medicine
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    ISSN1612-1783
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Keywords

    • Doctor–patient interaction
    • Ethnomethodological conversation analysis
    • Question-answer sequences
    • Questionnaires

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Getting to 'no': Three ways to jointly accomplish an answer to questions in a questionnaire in doctor–patient interaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this