Frontiers of mobility: Was Australia 1870–2017 a more socially mobile society than England?

Gregory Clark*, Andrew Leigh, Mike Pottenger

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There is longstanding pride among Australians that by throwing off the social class demarcations that defined their ossified colonial parent society, England, they created an open, socially mobile society. The paper tests this belief by estimating long run social mobility rates in Australia 1870–2017, using the status of rare surnames. The status information includes occupations from electoral rolls 1903–1980, and records of degrees awarded by Melbourne and Sydney universities 1852–2017. Status persistence was strong throughout, with an intergenerational correlation of occupational or educational status of 0.7–0.8, and no change over time. Mobility rates were also just as low within UK immigrants and their descendants, so ethnic group effects explain none of the immobility. The less pronounced class divisions of Australia compared to England did not enhance social mobility. A possible sign of enhanced Australian social mobility – the fact that surnames associated with convicts already had a modest elite status by 1870 – seems to derive from convicts transported to Australia from England being positively selected in terms of human capital.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101327
JournalExplorations in Economic History
Volume76
Number of pages7
ISSN0014-4983
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Social mobility
  • Social status
  • Surnames

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Frontiers of mobility: Was Australia 1870–2017 a more socially mobile society than England?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this