Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

First-year mortality in incident dialysis patients: results of the Peridialysis study

  • James Heaf*
  • , Maija Heiro
  • , Aivars Petersons
  • , Baiba Vernere
  • , Johan V. Povlsen
  • , Anette Bagger Sørensen
  • , Naomi Clyne
  • , Inga Bumblyte
  • , Alanta Zilinskiene
  • , Else Randers
  • , Niels Løkkegaard
  • , Mai Rosenberg
  • , Stig Kjellevold
  • , Jan Dominik Kampmann
  • , Björn Rogland
  • , Inger Lagreid
  • , Olof Heimburger
  • , Abdul Rashid Qureshi
  • , Bengt Lindholm
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde
  • Turku University Hospital
  • Riga East University Hospital
  • Aarhus University Hospital
  • Lund University
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
  • Regionshospitalet Viborg
  • Holbæk Sygehus
  • Tartu University Clinic
  • Vestfold Hospital Trust
  • St. Olav University Hospital
  • Karolinska Institute
  • Hospital of Kristianstad

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

64 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Controversy surrounds which factors are important for predicting early mortality after dialysis initiation (DI). We investigated associations of predialysis course and circumstances affecting planning and execution of DI with mortality following DI. Methods: Among 1580 patients participating in the Peridialysis study, a study of causes and timing of DI, we registered features of predialysis course, clinical and biochemical data at DI, incidence of unplanned suboptimal DI, contraindications to peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD), and modality preference, actual choice, and cause of modality choice. Patients were followed for 12 months or until transplantation. A flexible parametric model was used to identify independent factors associated with all-cause mortality. Results: First-year mortality was 19.33%. Independent factors predicting death were high age, comorbidity, clinical contraindications to PD or HD, suboptimal DI, high eGFR, low serum albumin, hyperphosphatemia, high C-reactive protein, signs of overhydration and cerebral symptoms at DI. Among 1061 (67.2%) patients who could select dialysis modality based on personal choice, 654 (61.6%) chose PD, 368 (34.7%) center HD and 39 (3.7%) home HD. The 12-months survival did not differ significantly between patients receiving PD and in-center HD. Conclusions: First-year mortality in incident dialysis patients was in addition to high age and comorbidity, associated with clinical contraindications to PD or HD, clinical symptoms, hyperphosphatemia, inflammation, and suboptimal DI. In patients with a “free” choice of dialysis modality based on their personal preferences, PD and in-center HD led to broadly similar short-term outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number229
JournalBMC Nephrology
Volume23
Number of pages12
ISSN1471-2369
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27. Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Funding

We thank all physicians and other staff members who participated in this study. Baxter Novum is the result of a grant from Baxter Healthcare to Karolinska Institutet. Thanks to Sara Denguir for data collection assistance. The project was supported by an unrestricted grant from Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, Illinois, USA, grant number 05253284. The funder had no role in study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; writing the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication.

Keywords

  • Hemodialysis
  • Mortality
  • Peritoneal dialysis
  • Survival analysis
  • Hyperphosphatemia/etiology
  • Humans
  • Renal Dialysis/methods
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic
  • Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects
  • Incidence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First-year mortality in incident dialysis patients: results of the Peridialysis study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this