Familial Risk and Heritability of Colorectal Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer

Rebecca E Graff, Sören Möller, Michael N Passarelli, John S Witte, Axel Skytthe, Kaare Christensen, Qihua Tan, Hans-Olov Adami, Kamila Czene, Jennifer R. Harris, Eero Pukkala, Jaakko Kaprio, Edward Giovannucci, Lorelei A Mucci, Jacob B Hjelmborg

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background & Aims We analyzed data from twins to determine how much the familial risk of colorectal cancer can be attributed to genetic factors vs environment. We also examined whether heritability is distinct for colon vs rectal cancer, given evidence of distinct etiologies. Methods Our data set included 39,990 monozygotic and 61,443 same-sex dizygotic twins from the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer. We compared each cancer's risk in twins of affected co-twins relative to the cohort risk (familial risk ratio [FRR]). We then estimated the proportion of variation in risk that could be attributed to genetic factors (heritability). Results From earliest registration in 1943 through 2010, there were 1861 individuals diagnosed with colon cancer and 1268 diagnosed with rectal cancer. Monozygotic twins of affected co-twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4–3.8) relative to the cohort risk. Dizygotic twins of affected co-twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7–2.7). We estimated that 40% (95% CI, 33%–48%) of the variation in colorectal cancer risk could be attributed to genetic factors; unique environment only accounted for the remaining liability. For colon cancer, the FRR was 3.3 (95% CI, 2.1–4.5) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7–3.5) for dizygotic twins. For rectal cancer, comparable estimates were 3.3 (95% CI, 1.5–5.1) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.2–4.0) for dizygotic twins. Heritability estimates for colon and rectal cancer were 16% (95% CI, 0–46%) and 15% (95% CI, 0–50%), common environment estimates were 15% (95% CI, 0–38%) and 11% (95% CI, 0–38%), and unique environment estimates were 68% (95% CI, 57%–79%) and 75% (95% CI, 61%–88%), respectively. Conclusions Interindividual genetic differences could account for 40% of the variation in susceptibility to colorectal cancer; risk for colon and rectal cancers might have less of a genetic component than risk for colorectal cancer. Siblings, and particularly monozygotic co-twins, of individuals with colon or rectal cancer should consider personalized screening.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume15
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1256-1264
ISSN1542-3565
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Biometric modeling
  • Concordance relative risk
  • genetic susceptibility
  • Zygosity
  • Biometric Modeling
  • Concordance Relative Risk
  • Genetic Susceptibility
  • Rectal Neoplasms/epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Twins, Dizygotic
  • Child, Preschool
  • Colonic Neoplasms/epidemiology
  • Family Health
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Young Adult
  • Europe/epidemiology
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Child
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Risk Assessment
  • Twins, Monozygotic
  • Adolescent
  • Individuality
  • Aged

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Familial Risk and Heritability of Colorectal Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this