Facilitators’ perceptions of children’s experiences in online philosophical dialogues

Frederik Schou-Juul, Søren Jensen, Caroline Schaffalitzky*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Philosophy with Children is a highly dialogic form of teaching and facilitation plays an important part in ensuring dialogic quality. During the philosophical dialogue, the facilitator estimates from the participants’ behaviour whether the dialogue is engaging, collaborative, and meaningful to the participants. However, little is known about facilitator assessment of participants’ experiences and how this assessment correlates with participants’ experiences of the learning environment. Our study examines five facilitators’ experiences from 58 online philosophical dialogues for school children and compares facilitator perceptions with participant and observer experiences. The results indicate that children can experience synchronous online dialogues as meaningful, collaborative, and supportive, but that facilitators have a tendency to underestimate the positive experiences of the children. We suggest that such a discrepancy in the assessment of dialogue experience might stem from a “non-participant bias” in facilitators.
Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Educational Research
ISSN0031-3831
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Facilitators’ perceptions of children’s experiences in online philosophical dialogues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this