Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Extinction, coextinction and colonization dynamics in plant–hummingbird networks under climate change

  • Jesper Sonne*
  • , Pietro K. Maruyama
  • , Ana M. Martín González
  • , Carsten Rahbek
  • , Jordi Bascompte
  • , Bo Dalsgaard
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • University of Copenhagen
    • Federal University of Minas Gerais
    • Pacific Ecoinformatics and Computational Ecology Lab
    • University of Zürich
    • Peking University

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

    Abstract

    Climate-driven range shifts may cause local extinctions, while the accompanying loss of biotic interactions may trigger secondary coextinctions. At the same time, climate change may facilitate colonizations from regional source pools, balancing out local species loss. At present, how these extinction–coextinction–colonization dynamics affect biological communities under climate change is poorly understood. Using 84 communities of interacting plants and hummingbirds, we simulated patterns in climate-driven extinctions, coextinctions and colonizations under future climate change scenarios. Our simulations showed clear geographic discrepancies in the communities’ vulnerability to climate change. Andean communities were the least affected by future climate change, as they experienced few climate-driven extinctions and coextinctions while having the highest colonization potential. In North America and lowland South America, communities had many climate-driven extinctions and few colonization events. Meanwhile, the pattern of coextinction was highly dependent on the configuration of networks formed by interacting hummingbirds and plants. Notably, North American communities experienced proportionally fewer coextinctions than other regions because climate-driven extinctions here primarily affected species with peripheral network roles. Moreover, coextinctions generally decreased in communities where species have few overlapping interactions, that is, communities with more complementary specialized and modular networks. Together, these results highlight that we should not expect colonizations to adequately balance out local extinctions in the most vulnerable ecoregions.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalNature Ecology and Evolution
    Volume6
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)720-729
    ISSN2397-334X
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

    Funding

    J.S. and C.R acknowledge the support of the VILLUM FONDEN for the Center for Global Mountain Biodiversity (grant no. 25925). A.M.M.G., C.R. and B.D. thank the Danish National Research Foundation for its support of the Center for Macroecology, Evolution, and Climate (grant no. DNRF96). P.K.M. thanks the support from Fapesp—The São Paulo Research Foundation (grant no. 2015/21457-4) and Fapemig—Minas Gerais Research Foundation (grant no. RED-00253-16). A.M.M.G. was supported through a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2015-704409). J.B.’s work is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 310030_197201).

    Keywords

    • Animals
    • Birds
    • Climate Change
    • Extinction, Biological
    • North America
    • Plants

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Extinction, coextinction and colonization dynamics in plant–hummingbird networks under climate change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this