Explaining the significance of participationist approaches for understanding students' knowledge acquisition

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

75 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article aims to appraise insights from participationist approaches to learning for understanding students' knowledge acquisition. The first part explicates the concepts of positioning, recognition, and identity through presenting a common ground for participationists and discussing different views on (a) the relationship between learning the content domain and positioning, recognition, and identity negotiation; (b) dynamicity of situativity; (c) relation of moment-to-moment situativity to long-term interaction patterns; (d) awareness of positioning, recognition, and identity. This allows an appraisal in the article's second part of a claim inherent to participationist views: It is necessary to adopt a system's view on learning opportunities presented to students in class because of the way positioning, recognition, and identity negotiation influence students' engagement with curricular content. A fifth issue emerges concerning the nature of this influence. Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence combine to support the conclusion that the claim holds some, not all, of the time.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEducational Psychologist
Volume51
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)188-209
ISSN0046-1520
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Recognition (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{cedc09571770476f919c1d630c94e5da,
title = "Explaining the significance of participationist approaches for understanding students' knowledge acquisition",
abstract = "This article aims to appraise insights from participationist approaches to learning for understanding students' knowledge acquisition. The first part explicates the concepts of positioning, recognition, and identity through presenting a common ground for participationists and discussing different views on (a) the relationship between learning the content domain and positioning, recognition, and identity negotiation; (b) dynamicity of situativity; (c) relation of moment-to-moment situativity to long-term interaction patterns; (d) awareness of positioning, recognition, and identity. This allows an appraisal in the article's second part of a claim inherent to participationist views: It is necessary to adopt a system's view on learning opportunities presented to students in class because of the way positioning, recognition, and identity negotiation influence students' engagement with curricular content. A fifth issue emerges concerning the nature of this influence. Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence combine to support the conclusion that the claim holds some, not all, of the time.",
author = "Dohn, {Nina Bonderup}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/00461520.2016.1160321",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "188--209",
journal = "Educational Psychologist",
issn = "0046-1520",
publisher = "Heinemann",
number = "2",

}

Explaining the significance of participationist approaches for understanding students' knowledge acquisition. / Dohn, Nina Bonderup.

In: Educational Psychologist, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2016, p. 188-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining the significance of participationist approaches for understanding students' knowledge acquisition

AU - Dohn, Nina Bonderup

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article aims to appraise insights from participationist approaches to learning for understanding students' knowledge acquisition. The first part explicates the concepts of positioning, recognition, and identity through presenting a common ground for participationists and discussing different views on (a) the relationship between learning the content domain and positioning, recognition, and identity negotiation; (b) dynamicity of situativity; (c) relation of moment-to-moment situativity to long-term interaction patterns; (d) awareness of positioning, recognition, and identity. This allows an appraisal in the article's second part of a claim inherent to participationist views: It is necessary to adopt a system's view on learning opportunities presented to students in class because of the way positioning, recognition, and identity negotiation influence students' engagement with curricular content. A fifth issue emerges concerning the nature of this influence. Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence combine to support the conclusion that the claim holds some, not all, of the time.

AB - This article aims to appraise insights from participationist approaches to learning for understanding students' knowledge acquisition. The first part explicates the concepts of positioning, recognition, and identity through presenting a common ground for participationists and discussing different views on (a) the relationship between learning the content domain and positioning, recognition, and identity negotiation; (b) dynamicity of situativity; (c) relation of moment-to-moment situativity to long-term interaction patterns; (d) awareness of positioning, recognition, and identity. This allows an appraisal in the article's second part of a claim inherent to participationist views: It is necessary to adopt a system's view on learning opportunities presented to students in class because of the way positioning, recognition, and identity negotiation influence students' engagement with curricular content. A fifth issue emerges concerning the nature of this influence. Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence combine to support the conclusion that the claim holds some, not all, of the time.

U2 - 10.1080/00461520.2016.1160321

DO - 10.1080/00461520.2016.1160321

M3 - Journal article

VL - 51

SP - 188

EP - 209

JO - Educational Psychologist

JF - Educational Psychologist

SN - 0046-1520

IS - 2

ER -