Emergency physicians' experiences with defensive medicine and their motives for acting defensively - an interview study

Thorbjørn Hougaard Mikkelsen*, Mikkel Brabrand, Anne Friesgaard Christensen, Merethe Kousgaard Andersen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Defensive medicine (DM) has been increasingly studied in recent years. This study aims to investigate the understanding of DM and the motives for practicing DM among emergency physicians. METHODS: Focus group interviews. RESULTS: Themes identified: The understanding of DM, DM is a matter of self-confidence, DM or tests to ensure diagnosis and patient flow, DM due to confounding by availability, DM due to guidelines, Patient-initiated DM, Fear of complaints, DM in an emergency department setting. CONCLUSION: This study shows that emergency physicians perform an abundance of diagnostic tests and investigations but only categorize few of them as DM. The many flow-mediating tests based on guidelines may, however, mask activities that individual physicians would possibly find defensive, if it was up to them to decide based on pure and simple anamnesis and clinical findings. It might be argued that flow optimization has overruled medical clinical reasoning in some ways, thereby introducing an inclination to conduct DM.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAcute Medicine
Volume23
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)132-139
ISSN1747-4884
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emergency physicians' experiences with defensive medicine and their motives for acting defensively - an interview study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this