Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

EGF61A>G polymorphism as predictive marker of clinical outcome to first-line capecitabine and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to investigate polymorphisms related to the metabolism of fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin, thymidylate synthase (TS) and excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) 118, in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX). We also investigated the importance of the EGF61A>G polymorphism, which holds a functional influence on the tyrosine kinase receptor regulation. Materials and methods: We included 68 patients treated with first-line XELOX. Polymorphism analyses were carried out on pretreatment blood samples. Response was evaluated according to the RECIST. Survival analysis was described by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank testing. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 38% and the median overall survival 19.4 months. A favorable outcome was seen in patients with the EGF61A/G genotype compared with the combined group of A/A and G/G, with response rates of 57% and 18%, respectively (P = 0.001). There was a significantly different progression-free survival (P = 0.018) in favor of the A/G group. The TS and ERCC1 genotypes failed to provide any significant impact on the outcome. CONCLUSION: Polymorphism analysis of a simple blood sample is a feasible approach to biomarker analysis and the EGF61A>G polymorphism may influence the effect of first-line XELOX. Consequently, this marker deserves further investigation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume21
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)535-539
ISSN0923-7534
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EGF61A>G polymorphism as predictive marker of clinical outcome to first-line capecitabine and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this