Effects of point-of-care testing in general practice for Type 2 Diabetes patients on ambulatory visits and hospitalizations

Troels Kristensen*, Kim Rose Olsen, Christian Volmar Skovsgaard

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Point-of-care testing (POCT) of HbA1c means instant test results and more coherent counseling that is expected to improve diabetes management and affect ambulatory visits and hospitalizations. From late 2008, POCT has been implemented and adopted by a segment of the general practices in the capital region of Denmark. The aim of this study is to assess whether the introduction of POCT of HbA1c in general practice (GP) has affected patient outcomes for T2 diabetes patients in terms of hospital activity. We apply difference-in-differences models at the GP clinic level to assess the casual effects of POCT on the following hospital outcomes: (1) admissions for diabetes, (2) admissions for ambulatory care sensitive diabetes conditions (ACSCs), (3) ambulatory visits for diabetes. The use of POCT is remunerated by a fee, and registration of this fee is used to measure the GP’s use of POCT. The control group includes clinics from the same region that did not use POCT. The sensitivity of our results is assessed by an event study approach and a range of robustness tests. The panel data set includes 553 GP clinics and approximately 30,000 diabetes patients from the capital region of Denmark, observed in the years 2004–2012. We find that voluntary adoption of POCT of HbA1c in GP has no effect on hospital admissions and diabetes-related hospital ambulatory visits. Event study analysis and different treatment definitions confirm the robustness of these results. If implementation of POCT of HbA1c improves other parts of diabetes management as indicated in the literature, it seems worthwhile to implement POCT of HbA1c in the capital region of Denmark. However, doubts around the quality of POCT of HbA1c testing and a desire to capture data at central labs may prevent implementation of more value based HbA1c testing.
Original languageEnglish
Article number6185
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume17
Issue number17
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
ISSN1661-7827
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26. Aug 2020

Keywords

  • Ambulatory visits
  • Diabetes
  • Difference-in-differences (DID) models
  • Event study analysis
  • General practice
  • HbA1c
  • Hospital admissions
  • Patient data
  • Point-of-care testing (POCT)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of point-of-care testing in general practice for Type 2 Diabetes patients on ambulatory visits and hospitalizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this