Does Design Thinking Benefit Ambidextrous Dynamics between SME Managers’ Entrepreneurial and Administrative Mindsets?

Suna Løwe Nielsen, Poul Rind Christensen*, Pia Storvang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

135 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The overall aim of this study is to explore the potential of Design Thinking to bring value to small firms through ambidexterity, which is essential to firms’ performance and survival. Specifically, we investigate how Design Thinking can benefit ambidextrous dynamics between small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) managers’ entrepreneurial and administrative mindsets. The empirical foundation of our study is in-depth qualitative data on 24 SME managers who participated in a two-year research project driven by Design Thinking. The study reveals that Design Thinking does put into motion the managers’ ambidextrous thinking. Some Design Thinking principles reinforce entrepreneurial thinking, some administrative management thinking, while others, again reinforce flexible ambidextrous management thinking.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Design Journal
Volume24
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)1-21
ISSN1460-6925
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • SMEs
  • administrative management thinking
  • ambidexterity
  • design thinking
  • entrepreneurial thinking
  • intrapreneurship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Design Thinking Benefit Ambidextrous Dynamics between SME Managers’ Entrepreneurial and Administrative Mindsets?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this