TY - JOUR
T1 - Deprescribing practices, habits and attitudes of geriatricians and geriatricians-in-training across Europe
T2 - a large web-based survey
AU - van Poelgeest, Eveline P.
AU - Seppala, Lotta J.
AU - Lee, Jihoo M.
AU - Bahat, Gülistan
AU - Ilhan, Birkan
AU - Lavan, Amanda H.
AU - Mair, Alpana
AU - van Marum, Rob J.
AU - Onder, Graziano
AU - Ryg, Jesper
AU - Fernandes, Marília Andreia
AU - Garfinkel, Doron
AU - Guðmundsson, Aðalsteinn
AU - Hartikainen, Sirpa
AU - Kotsani, Marina
AU - Montero-Errasquín, Beatriz
AU - Neumann-Podczaska, Agnieszka
AU - Pazan, Farhad
AU - Petrovic, Mirko
AU - Soulis, George
AU - Vankova, Hana
AU - Wehling, Martin
AU - Wieczorowska–Tobis, Katarzyna
AU - van der Velde, Nathalie
AU - On Behalf of the EuGMS SIG Pharmacology
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Purpose: To provide an overview of the current deprescribing attitudes, practices, and approaches of geriatricians and geriatricians-in-training across Europe. Methods: An online survey was disseminated among European geriatricians and geriatricians-in-training. The survey comprised Likert scale and multiple-choice questions on deprescribing approaches and practices, deprescribing education and knowledge, and facilitators/barriers of deprescribing. Responses to the survey questions and participant characteristics were quantified and differences evaluated between geriatricians and geriatricians-in-training and between European regions. Results: The 964 respondents (median age 42 years old; 64% female; 21% geriatricians-in-training) were generally willing to deprescribe (98%) and felt confident about deprescribing (85%). Despite differences across European regions, the most commonly reported reasons for deprescribing were functional impairment and occurrence of adverse drug reactions. The most important barriers for deprescribing were patients’ unwillingness, fear of negative consequences, lack of time, and poor communication between multiple prescribers. Perceived risk of adverse drug reactions was highest for psychotropic drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cardiovascular drugs, and opioid analgesics. Only one in four respondents (23% of geriatricians and 37% of geriatricians-in-training) think education in medical school had sufficiently prepared them for deprescribing in clinical practice. They reported that their future deprescribing activities would probably increase with improved information sharing between various prescribers, deprescribing recommendations in guidelines, and increased education and training. Approximately 90% think that a paradigm shift is required for prescribers and patients, increasing focus on the possible benefits of deprescribing (potentially) inappropriate medications. Conclusions: Based on the outcomes of this survey, we recommend investing in improved inter-professional communication, better education and evidence-based recommendations to improve future patient-centered deprescribing practices.
AB - Purpose: To provide an overview of the current deprescribing attitudes, practices, and approaches of geriatricians and geriatricians-in-training across Europe. Methods: An online survey was disseminated among European geriatricians and geriatricians-in-training. The survey comprised Likert scale and multiple-choice questions on deprescribing approaches and practices, deprescribing education and knowledge, and facilitators/barriers of deprescribing. Responses to the survey questions and participant characteristics were quantified and differences evaluated between geriatricians and geriatricians-in-training and between European regions. Results: The 964 respondents (median age 42 years old; 64% female; 21% geriatricians-in-training) were generally willing to deprescribe (98%) and felt confident about deprescribing (85%). Despite differences across European regions, the most commonly reported reasons for deprescribing were functional impairment and occurrence of adverse drug reactions. The most important barriers for deprescribing were patients’ unwillingness, fear of negative consequences, lack of time, and poor communication between multiple prescribers. Perceived risk of adverse drug reactions was highest for psychotropic drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cardiovascular drugs, and opioid analgesics. Only one in four respondents (23% of geriatricians and 37% of geriatricians-in-training) think education in medical school had sufficiently prepared them for deprescribing in clinical practice. They reported that their future deprescribing activities would probably increase with improved information sharing between various prescribers, deprescribing recommendations in guidelines, and increased education and training. Approximately 90% think that a paradigm shift is required for prescribers and patients, increasing focus on the possible benefits of deprescribing (potentially) inappropriate medications. Conclusions: Based on the outcomes of this survey, we recommend investing in improved inter-professional communication, better education and evidence-based recommendations to improve future patient-centered deprescribing practices.
KW - Adverse drug effects
KW - Deprescribing
KW - Geriatric medicine
KW - Medication review
KW - Older adults
KW - Online survey
U2 - 10.1007/s41999-022-00702-9
DO - 10.1007/s41999-022-00702-9
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36319837
AN - SCOPUS:85141195089
SN - 1878-7649
VL - 13
SP - 1455
EP - 1466
JO - European Geriatric Medicine
JF - European Geriatric Medicine
IS - 6
ER -