Denying Knowledge

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Intuitions about contextualist cases such as Cohen's airport case pose a problem for classical anti-skeptical versions of invariantism. Recently, Tim Black (2005), Jessica Brown (2006), and Patrick Rysiew (2001, 2005, 2007) have argued that the classical invariantist can respond by arguing that pragmatic aspects of epistemic discourse are responsible for the relevant problematic intuitions. This paper identifies the mechanisms of conversational implicature and impliciture as the basic sources of hope for this explanatory strategy. It then argues that neither of these sources provides the classical invariantist with a convincing response to the airport case and its analogs.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalCanadian Journal of Philosophy
    Volume44
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)36-55
    ISSN0045-5091
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2014

    Keywords

    • Contextualism
    • Implicature
    • Impliciture
    • Invariantism
    • Pragmatics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Denying Knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this