Denying Knowledge

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Intuitions about contextualist cases such as Cohen's airport case pose a problem for classical anti-skeptical versions of invariantism. Recently, Tim Black (2005), Jessica Brown (2006), and Patrick Rysiew (2001, 2005, 2007) have argued that the classical invariantist can respond by arguing that pragmatic aspects of epistemic discourse are responsible for the relevant problematic intuitions. This paper identifies the mechanisms of conversational implicature and impliciture as the basic sources of hope for this explanatory strategy. It then argues that neither of these sources provides the classical invariantist with a convincing response to the airport case and its analogs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCanadian Journal of Philosophy
Volume44
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)36-55
ISSN0045-5091
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014

Keywords

  • Contextualism
  • Implicature
  • Impliciture
  • Invariantism
  • Pragmatics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Denying Knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this