Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes

  • Thierry Facon
  • , Philippe Moreau
  • , Katja Weisel
  • , Hartmut Goldschmidt
  • , Saad Z. Usmani
  • , Ajai Chari
  • , Torben Plesner
  • , Robert Z. Orlowski
  • , Nizar Bahlis
  • , Supratik Basu
  • , Cyrille Hulin
  • , Hang Quach
  • , Michael O’Dwyer
  • , Aurore Perrot
  • , Caroline Jacquet
  • , Christopher P. Venner
  • , Noopur Raje
  • , Mourad Tiab
  • , Margaret Macro
  • , Laurent Frenzel
  • Xavier Leleu, Gordon Cook, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Lille
  • University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • University of Calgary
  • The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
  • University Hospital Center
  • University of Melbourne
  • National University of Ireland Galway
  • University of Toulouse
  • University Hospital of Nancy
  • University of Alberta
  • BC Cancer Agency
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • CHD Vendée
  • CHU de Caen
  • Necker Enfants Malades Hospital
  • Poitiers University Hospital
  • University of Leeds
  • Janssen Research & Development
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the MAIA study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report updated efficacy and safety from MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), including a subgroup analysis by patient age (<70, ≥70 to <75, ≥75, and ≥80 years). Overall, 737 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint, PFS, was improved with D-Rd versus Rd (median, 61.9 vs 34.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–0.67; P < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the D-Rd group versus 65.5 months in the Rd group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.83; P = 0.0003); estimated 60-month OS rates were 66.6% and 53.6%, respectively. D-Rd achieved higher rates of complete response or better (≥CR; 51.1% vs 30.1%), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (32.1% vs 11.1%), and sustained MRD negativity (≥18 months: 16.8% vs 3.3%) versus Rd (all P < 0.0001). D-Rd demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy benefits across age groups. No new safety concerns were observed. Updated results (median follow-up, >5 years) continue to support frontline use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM.

Original languageEnglish
JournalLeukemia
Volume39
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)942-950
ISSN0887-6924
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
  • Dexamethasone/administration & dosage
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Lenalidomide/administration & dosage
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy
  • Prognosis
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this