Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared care models present an opportunity for patients to receive the benefits of specialist care combined with the continuity of care provided by a GP.

AIM: To test the effects on GP-perceived involvement in cancer care and their satisfaction with this cross-sectoral information after bringing the patient, GP, and oncologist together in a shared video consultation.

DESIGN & SETTING: GPs from the Region of Southern Denmark evaluated a randomised controlled trial testing shared video consultations.

METHOD: This study describes secondary outcomes based on a 4 months' follow-up survey from GPs participating in The Partnership Project (PSP). Patient perception of coordination of care at 7 months' follow-up was the primary outcome of the PSP. A tripartite video consultation was conducted during cancer treatment to share tasks and roles between health professionals with the patient.

RESULTS: The study included 281 patients, and 105 unique GPs returned 124 questionnaires. Video consultations were accomplished in 68% of scheduled cases. The study found an increased odds ratio (OR) of 3.03 for GP satisfaction with the distribution of tasks and roles, and they experienced more involvement in the cancer patients' trajectory. The study found an increased OR of 6.95 for the GP perception of more direct contact and dialogue with the Department of Oncology. There was a decreased OR of 0.88 for the GP to be engaged in handling anxiety and psychological concerns.

CONCLUSION: The study showed that involving the GP in one shared consultation increased the odds of the GP being satisfied with the distribution of tasks and roles, and feeling more involved in the cancer patient's trajectory. However, recruitment and response rates from GPs were limiting factors.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBJGP Open
ISSN2398-3795
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16. Feb 2021

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-sectoral video consultation in cancer care: GPs' evaluation of a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this