Cross-cultural narratives of weaponised artificial intelligence: Comparing France, India, Japan and the United States

Ingvild Bode*, Hendrik Huelss, Anna Nadibaidze, Tom Watts

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Stories about ‘intelligent machines’ have long featured in popular culture. Existing research has mapped these artificial intelligence (AI) narratives but lacks an in-depth understanding of (a) narratives related specifically to weaponised AI and autonomous weapon systems and (b) whether and how these narratives resonate across different states and associated cultural contexts. We speak to these gaps by examining narratives about weaponised AI across publics in France, India, Japan and the US. Based on a public opinion survey conducted in these states in 2022–2023, we find that narratives found in English-language popular culture are shared cross-culturally, although with some variations. However, we also find culturally distinct narratives, particularly in India and Japan. Further, we assess whether these narratives shape the publics’ attitudes towards regulating weaponised AI. Although respondents demonstrate overall uncertainty and lack of knowledge regarding developments in the sphere of weaponised AI, they assess these technologies in a negative-leaning way and mostly support regulation. With these findings, our study offers a first step towards further investigating the extent to which weaponised AI narratives circulate globally and how salient perceptions of these technologies are across different publics.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBig Data & Society
Volume11
Issue number4
ISSN2053-9517
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • autonomous weapon systems
  • narratives
  • popular culture
  • survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-cultural narratives of weaponised artificial intelligence: Comparing France, India, Japan and the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this