Cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care versus self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

123 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

AIMS: To assess whether primary sector healthcare in the form of chiropractic care is cost-effective compared with self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain, that is, a subgroup of patients with non-specific chest pain.

METHODS AND RESULTS: 115 adults aged 18-75 years with acute, non-specific chest pain of musculoskeletal origin were recruited from a cardiology department in Denmark. After ruling out acute coronary syndrome and receiving usual care, patients with musculoskeletal chest pain were randomised to 4 weeks of community-based chiropractic care (n=59) or to a single information session aimed at encouraging self-management as complementary to usual care (n=56). Data on resource use were obtained from Danish national registries and valued from a societal perspective. Patient cost and health-related quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; based on EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36)) were compared in cost-effectiveness analyses over 12 months from baseline. Mean costs were €2183 lower for the group with chiropractic care, but not statistically significant (95% CI -4410.5 to 43.0). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio suggested that chiropractic care was cost-effective with a probability of 97%, given a threshold value of €30 000 per QALY gained. In both groups, there was an increase in the health-related quality of life, and the mean increases were similar over the 12-month evaluation period. The mean differences in QALYs between the groups were negligible.

CONCLUSIONS: Chiropractic care was more cost-effective than self-management. Therefore, chiropractic care can be seen as a good example of a targeted primary care approach for a subgroup of patients with non-specific chest pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00462241.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere000334
JournalOpen Heart
Volume3
Issue number1
ISSN2398-595X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Chiropractic
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Primary Health Care
Quality of Life
Denmark
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Health Surveys
Registries

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Cite this

@article{56bb4626a80f42299b020f872f70fd19,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care versus self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain",
abstract = "AIMS: To assess whether primary sector healthcare in the form of chiropractic care is cost-effective compared with self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain, that is, a subgroup of patients with non-specific chest pain.METHODS AND RESULTS: 115 adults aged 18-75 years with acute, non-specific chest pain of musculoskeletal origin were recruited from a cardiology department in Denmark. After ruling out acute coronary syndrome and receiving usual care, patients with musculoskeletal chest pain were randomised to 4 weeks of community-based chiropractic care (n=59) or to a single information session aimed at encouraging self-management as complementary to usual care (n=56). Data on resource use were obtained from Danish national registries and valued from a societal perspective. Patient cost and health-related quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; based on EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36)) were compared in cost-effectiveness analyses over 12 months from baseline. Mean costs were €2183 lower for the group with chiropractic care, but not statistically significant (95{\%} CI -4410.5 to 43.0). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio suggested that chiropractic care was cost-effective with a probability of 97{\%}, given a threshold value of €30 000 per QALY gained. In both groups, there was an increase in the health-related quality of life, and the mean increases were similar over the 12-month evaluation period. The mean differences in QALYs between the groups were negligible.CONCLUSIONS: Chiropractic care was more cost-effective than self-management. Therefore, chiropractic care can be seen as a good example of a targeted primary care approach for a subgroup of patients with non-specific chest pain.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00462241.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Stochkendahl, {Mette Jensen} and Jan S{\o}rensen and Werner Vach and Christensen, {Henrik Wulff} and H{\o}ilund-Carlsen, {Poul Flemming} and Jan Hartvigsen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1136/openhrt-2015-000334",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Open Heart",
issn = "2398-595X",
publisher = "BMJ",
number = "1",

}

Cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care versus self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain. / Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen; Sørensen, Jan; Vach, Werner; Christensen, Henrik Wulff; Høilund-Carlsen, Poul Flemming; Hartvigsen, Jan.

In: Open Heart, Vol. 3, No. 1, e000334, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care versus self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain

AU - Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen

AU - Sørensen, Jan

AU - Vach, Werner

AU - Christensen, Henrik Wulff

AU - Høilund-Carlsen, Poul Flemming

AU - Hartvigsen, Jan

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - AIMS: To assess whether primary sector healthcare in the form of chiropractic care is cost-effective compared with self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain, that is, a subgroup of patients with non-specific chest pain.METHODS AND RESULTS: 115 adults aged 18-75 years with acute, non-specific chest pain of musculoskeletal origin were recruited from a cardiology department in Denmark. After ruling out acute coronary syndrome and receiving usual care, patients with musculoskeletal chest pain were randomised to 4 weeks of community-based chiropractic care (n=59) or to a single information session aimed at encouraging self-management as complementary to usual care (n=56). Data on resource use were obtained from Danish national registries and valued from a societal perspective. Patient cost and health-related quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; based on EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36)) were compared in cost-effectiveness analyses over 12 months from baseline. Mean costs were €2183 lower for the group with chiropractic care, but not statistically significant (95% CI -4410.5 to 43.0). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio suggested that chiropractic care was cost-effective with a probability of 97%, given a threshold value of €30 000 per QALY gained. In both groups, there was an increase in the health-related quality of life, and the mean increases were similar over the 12-month evaluation period. The mean differences in QALYs between the groups were negligible.CONCLUSIONS: Chiropractic care was more cost-effective than self-management. Therefore, chiropractic care can be seen as a good example of a targeted primary care approach for a subgroup of patients with non-specific chest pain.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00462241.

AB - AIMS: To assess whether primary sector healthcare in the form of chiropractic care is cost-effective compared with self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain, that is, a subgroup of patients with non-specific chest pain.METHODS AND RESULTS: 115 adults aged 18-75 years with acute, non-specific chest pain of musculoskeletal origin were recruited from a cardiology department in Denmark. After ruling out acute coronary syndrome and receiving usual care, patients with musculoskeletal chest pain were randomised to 4 weeks of community-based chiropractic care (n=59) or to a single information session aimed at encouraging self-management as complementary to usual care (n=56). Data on resource use were obtained from Danish national registries and valued from a societal perspective. Patient cost and health-related quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; based on EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36)) were compared in cost-effectiveness analyses over 12 months from baseline. Mean costs were €2183 lower for the group with chiropractic care, but not statistically significant (95% CI -4410.5 to 43.0). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio suggested that chiropractic care was cost-effective with a probability of 97%, given a threshold value of €30 000 per QALY gained. In both groups, there was an increase in the health-related quality of life, and the mean increases were similar over the 12-month evaluation period. The mean differences in QALYs between the groups were negligible.CONCLUSIONS: Chiropractic care was more cost-effective than self-management. Therefore, chiropractic care can be seen as a good example of a targeted primary care approach for a subgroup of patients with non-specific chest pain.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00462241.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000334

DO - 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000334

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27175285

VL - 3

JO - Open Heart

JF - Open Heart

SN - 2398-595X

IS - 1

M1 - e000334

ER -