Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Copenhagen consensus statements on workplace health enhancing physical activity programmes

  • Adam B. Evans
  • , Michelle Skov Blagdon
  • , Lynne Boddy
  • , Tina Dalager*
  • , Stefano De Dominicis
  • , Charlotte Edwardson
  • , Annika Frahsa
  • , Anna Gerke
  • , Lee Graves
  • , Genevieve N. Healy
  • , Hannah Henderson
  • , Remco Hoekman
  • , Verena Lenneis
  • , Filip Mess
  • , Claudio Nigg
  • , Ailsa Niven
  • , Marie Overbye
  • , Salvador Angosto Sanchez
  • , Louise Fleng Sandal
  • , Jeroen Scheerder
  • Karen Søgaard, Anne Tjønndal, Frank Vandaele, Hanna Vehmas
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Liverpool John Moores University
  • University of Leicester
  • University of Bern
  • Audencia Business School
  • The University of Queensland
  • University of Lincoln
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Mulier Institute
  • Aalborg University
  • Technical University of Munich
  • The University of Edinburgh
  • University of Murcia
  • University of Leuven
  • Nord University
  • Artevelde University of Applied Sciences
  • University of Jyväskylä

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Workplace health enhancing physical activity (HEPA) programmes are associated with physical activity promotion and reduction of sedentary time among employees. Whilst the workplace is often considered an appropriate setting for such programmes, however, ethical and implementation challenges remain. Furthermore, debate still exists concerning programme rationale, efficacy, effectiveness, and impact. In 2024, 24 researchers from twelve countries collaborated to establish evidence-based consensus statements concerning such programmes. The consensus was developed through an iterative process involving experts from sociology, psychology, sport policy, physiology and promoting and assessing movement behaviours. In total 36 consensus statements and 23 areas identified for further research were produced. A broad definition of HEPA was adopted that included structured and unstructured activities, whilst HEPA was distinguished from occupational and leisure-time activities. Consensus highlighted, for example, the importance of multi-level approaches to programme implementation, the need for managerial support, and the need to tailor programme design. The consensus also demonstrated the need for more research on the long-term impacts of workplace HEPA programmes, to investigate the potential role of technology, and to further understand the influence of socio-cultural and individual factors on participation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal for Sport and Society
Volume22
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)93-103
ISSN1613-8171
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3. Feb 2025

Keywords

  • consensus
  • Promoting and assessing movement behaviours
  • sociology, psychology, sport management
  • Workplace health enhancing physical activity programmes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Copenhagen consensus statements on workplace health enhancing physical activity programmes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this