Context matters in smoking prevention: evaluating smoke-free school hours in Danish vocational schools

Dina Danielsen*, Tina Storgaard Jensen, Simone Gad Kjeld, Lotus Sofie Bast, Susan Andersen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)


Youth is a crucial period for smoking preventive interventions. School-based interventions targeting the policy level and the sociocultural processes of smoking show promising effects in reducing smoking uptake and prevalence. This study presents findings from the qualitative process evaluation of a smoking preventive intervention, Focus, in the vocational school (VET) setting. Specifically, the study focused on contextual factors affecting the implementation of smoke-free school hours (SFSH). Participant observations and focus groups were conducted in four VETs during the implementation period October–December 2018. The data encompass participant observation field notes (n = 21 school days), student focus groups (n = 8) (aged 16–20), teacher focus groups (n = 5) and semi-structured individual interviews with VET leaders (n = 3). The study found that SFSH was not clearly communicated to students due to the educational structure and chaotic rhythm of the school days, ambivalent attitudes among teachers toward enforcement of smoking rules and lack of clear managerial support. The interplay of these factors counteracted the implementation of SFSH in the VET context. The presented contextual factors are important when interpreting the effectiveness of the Focus intervention and for informing future preventive efforts aiming to reduce smoking among youth in high risk of smoking cigarettes.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberdaad30
JournalHealth promotion international
Issue number2
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023


Dive into the research topics of 'Context matters in smoking prevention: evaluating smoke-free school hours in Danish vocational schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this