Context framework for analysing situated knowledge transformation

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    89 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The aim of this chapter is to nuance the claim that context plays a significant role in determining knowledge. This is done through investigating how to balance context-dependency with its counterpart of compositionality. The claim is that context provides some form and content to knowledge, but that how much will vary between knowledge forms and between contexts themselves. Conversely, some aspects of some knowledge forms will sometimes stay the same across some contexts. In the first part of the chapter, we set out a framework of five context levels that makes it possible to analyse knowledge in specific situations. The levels are domain, activity, life setting, social structure and cultural practices. By way of illustration, we provide two examples of how the framework can be used. The final two sections are spent on developing the philosophical underpinnings of the idea of balancing context-dependency and compositionality in our understanding of knowledge. The need for balancing can be found most clearly in systematic studies of language, and the final section explores firstly, how influential discussions of situativity have relied on this comparison with language, and secondly, how the comparison can inform analyses of knowledge.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDesigning for situated knowledge transformation
    EditorsNina Bonderup Dohn, Stig Børsen Hansen, Jens Jørgen Hansen
    Place of PublicationAbingdon
    PublisherRoutledge
    Publication date2020
    Edition1.
    Pages59-74
    Chapter4
    ISBN (Print)9780367225735
    ISBN (Electronic)9780429275692
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2020
    SeriesRoutledge Research in Education

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Context framework for analysing situated knowledge transformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this