Congenital malformations in Denmark: Considerations for the use of danish health care registries

Anne Broe*, Per Damkier, Anton Pottegård, Jesper Hallas, Mette Bliddal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Danish health registers are used widely to examine associations between specific risk factors and congenital malformations. Various overall prevalence rates of malformations have been reported in Denmark indicating differences in the underlying data sources or malformation definitions. We described trends in registration of malformations in Denmark 1997–2017 and identified potential caveats for the use of Danish health registries in epidemiological studies. We composed a Danish adaptation of EUROCATs definition of malformations. Methods: Using nationwide Danish health registries, we identified all recorded pregnancies and followed livebirths for up to 5 years. We described the different data sources, ways to identify malformations, the overall rate of malformations over time, and identified the 10 most common major malformations. Results: A total of 1,340,774 foetuses and infants from 1,313,281 pregnancies among 747,144 women from 1997 to 2017 were analysed. Using primary and secondary diagnoses from all available sources and restricting hip malformations to diagnoses after 6 weeks postpartum, we found that 65,411 (49/1000) foetuses or infants had at least one major malformation defined by our Danish translation of EUROCATs definition of malformations. The prevalence of major malformations increased over time from 39/1000 in 1997 to 53/1000 in 2017. The most common specific malformations were malformations of cardiac septa (Q21) and great arteries (Q25) with a peak of 10 and 6/1000 births in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Conclusion: Malformations should be identified using primary and secondary diagnoses from the Birth register, the Patient register, and the Cause of Death register. To increase transparency and external validity, classification of major malformations should be based on the Danish adaptation of EUROCATs classification of malformations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Epidemiology
Volume12
Pages (from-to)1371-1380
Number of pages10
ISSN1179-1349
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15. Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Anomalies
  • Epidemiology
  • EUROCAT
  • Health registries
  • Malformations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Congenital malformations in Denmark: Considerations for the use of danish health care registries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this