Conceptualising Proportionality and Criminal Sanctions in EU Law: Three Different Visions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The principle of proportionality is a key principle in EU law; however, it has distinctive meanings in different contexts. In the field of free movement, proportionality constrains the Member States’ possibilities to diverge from EU law on the basis of the requirement of suitability and necessity. In the area of EU competences it is a principle that guides the relationship between the EU and Member States and requires the EU legislator to use the least intrusive means of regulation/legislation to protect state sovereignty. There is also a third approach to proportionality in the field of EU sanctions and the Court of Justice’s case-law, which entails that the sanction imposed must be commensurate to the gravity of the offence. This more conventional criminal law ‘retrospective’ version of proportionality has now been enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and suggests that ‘the severity of penalties must not be disproportionate to the criminal offence’..
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProportionality of Criminal Penalties in EU Law
EditorsLorenzo Grossio, Stefano Montaldo, Valsamis Mitsilegas
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherHart Publishing
Publication date6. Feb 2025
Pages9-24
Chapter2
ISBN (Print)9781509974153
ISBN (Electronic)9781509974177, 9781509974160, 9781509974184
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6. Feb 2025
SeriesHart Studies in European Criminal Law

Bibliographical note

The author welcomes the very constructive comments and feedbacks from Stefano Montaldo and Lorenzo Grossio which helped improve the final version of this chapter.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualising Proportionality and Criminal Sanctions in EU Law: Three Different Visions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this