Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing identification of clinically relevant Prevotella species by VITEK MS and MALDI biotyper

  • Nurver Ulger Toprak
  • , Alida C M Veloo
  • , Edit Urban
  • , Ingrid Wybo
  • , Helene Jean-Pierre
  • , Trefor Morris
  • , Ulrik Stenz Justesen
  • , Vesna Tripkovic
  • , Samo Jeverica
  • , Guner Soyletir
  • , Elisabeth Nagy
  • , ESCMID Study Group for Anaerobic Infections (ESGAI)
  • Marmara University
  • University of Groningen
  • University of Szeged
  • University Hospital Brussels
  • Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Public Health Wales NHS Trust
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb
  • University of Ljubljana

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of MALDI Biotyper and VITEK MS, for identification of Prevotella species. Three hundred and fourteen clinical isolates, collected in eight European countries between January 2014 and April 2016, were identified at the collecting sites by MALDI Biotyper (versions 3.0 and 3.1) and then reidentified by VITEK MS (version 3.0) in the central laboratory. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used as a standard method. According to sequence analysis, the 314 Prevotella strains belonged to 19 species. MALDI Biotyper correctly identified 281 (89.5%) isolates to the species level and 33 (10.5%) only at the genus level. VITEK MS correctly identified 253 (80.6%) isolates at the species level and 276 (87.9%) isolates at the genus level. Thirty-three isolates belonging to P. bergensis, P. conceptionensis, P. corporis, P. histicola, and P. nanciensis, unavailable in the VITEK MS 3.0 database, were resulted in genus level or no identification. Six Prevotella strains, belonged to P. veroralis, P. timonensis, and P. conceptionensis not represented in the MALDI Biotyper system database, were misidentified at the genus level. In conclusion, both VITEK MS and MALDI Biotyper provided reliable and rapid identification. However, the permanent extension of the databases is needed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica
Volume67
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)6-13
ISSN1217-8950
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1. Mar 2020

Keywords

  • 16S rRNA gene sequencing
  • Anaerobic bacteria
  • MALDI Biotyper
  • Mass spectrometry
  • Prevotella
  • VITEK MS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing identification of clinically relevant Prevotella species by VITEK MS and MALDI biotyper'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this