Change within Purchasing and Supply Management Organisations – Assessing the Claims from Maturity Models

Peter Holm Andreasen, Britta Gammelgaard

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

It is a wide-held assumption that professional development and change within purchasing and supply management (PSM) organisations can be explained and guided by a maturity model. In this paper the guidance which the maturity model concept offers to understand a PSM organisation's performance is assessed. The methodology is based on the outcomes of a literature review of PSM maturity models, development of an organisational change framework and the learning from three qualitative case studies. An alternative understanding of the development of the PSM organisation is offered through an organisational change framework, composing 1) movement transitions, 2) scalability of change, 3) acceptability of change, and 4) the substantive element of change. The research found that extant PSM maturity models are too rigid for PSM managers to apply, and although maturity models are commonly accepted in PSM literature, in practice, they may produce the opposite effect of what is promised. The PSM maturity models suggest that their application will lead to increased status and influence of PSM within the organisation; expectations that may not be met. PSM organisations’ change processes are subjected to a range of situational and contextual power relations which must be considered in order to advance the specific PSM organisation roles and responsibilities.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Volume24
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)151-163
Number of pages13
ISSN1478-4092
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Published online 6 December 2017.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Change within Purchasing and Supply Management Organisations – Assessing the Claims from Maturity Models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this