Challenges in using wearable GPS devices in low-income older adults

Can map-based interviews help with assessments of mobility?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Daily mobility, defined as the ability to move oneself within one's neighborhood and regions beyond, is an important construct, which affects people as they age. Having a feasible and valid measure of daily mobility is essential to understand how it affects older adults' everyday life. Given the limitations of existing measures, new tools may be needed. The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility and practicality of using the map-based questionnaire system VERITAS and GPS devices to measure daily mobility in older adults living in a deprived neighborhood in Denmark. Older adults were recruited from two senior housing areas, completed an interview using VERITAS and wore a GPS for 7 days. Feasibility of both methods was assessed by looking at practicalities, recruitment and compliance, and ability to measure daily mobility.Thirty-four older adults completed the VERITAS questionnaire, of which 23 wore the GPS device. Remembering to wear and charge the GPS was difficult for 48% participants, whereas remembering street names and drawing routes in VERITAS was difficult for two. Both the GPS and VERITAS were able to measure 10 out of the 13 identified components of mobility; however, VERITAS seemed more qualified at measuring daily mobility for this target population. The feasibility of assessing mobility may vary by specific context and study population being investigated. Wearable technology like a GPS may not be acceptable to low socioeconomic older adults, whereas interview led self-reported measurements like VERITAS might be more suitable for a low socioeconomic elderly population.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTransnational Behaviol Medicine
Volume9
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)99-109
ISSN1869-6716
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15. Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Interviews
Equipment and Supplies
Health Services Needs and Demand
Denmark
Population
Compliance
Names
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Feasibility
  • GPS
  • Low-income community
  • Older adults
  • VERITAS
  • Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Spatial Behavior
  • Male
  • Motor Activity
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Patient Selection
  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Poverty
  • Self Report
  • Wearable Electronic Devices
  • Pilot Projects
  • Geographic Information Systems/instrumentation
  • Aged
  • Patient Compliance

Cite this

@article{590af8a051b848e78eb5e5cd72fdaaad,
title = "Challenges in using wearable GPS devices in low-income older adults: Can map-based interviews help with assessments of mobility?",
abstract = "Daily mobility, defined as the ability to move oneself within one's neighborhood and regions beyond, is an important construct, which affects people as they age. Having a feasible and valid measure of daily mobility is essential to understand how it affects older adults' everyday life. Given the limitations of existing measures, new tools may be needed. The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility and practicality of using the map-based questionnaire system VERITAS and GPS devices to measure daily mobility in older adults living in a deprived neighborhood in Denmark. Older adults were recruited from two senior housing areas, completed an interview using VERITAS and wore a GPS for 7 days. Feasibility of both methods was assessed by looking at practicalities, recruitment and compliance, and ability to measure daily mobility.Thirty-four older adults completed the VERITAS questionnaire, of which 23 wore the GPS device. Remembering to wear and charge the GPS was difficult for 48{\%} participants, whereas remembering street names and drawing routes in VERITAS was difficult for two. Both the GPS and VERITAS were able to measure 10 out of the 13 identified components of mobility; however, VERITAS seemed more qualified at measuring daily mobility for this target population. The feasibility of assessing mobility may vary by specific context and study population being investigated. Wearable technology like a GPS may not be acceptable to low socioeconomic older adults, whereas interview led self-reported measurements like VERITAS might be more suitable for a low socioeconomic elderly population.",
keywords = "Feasibility, GPS, Low-income community, Older adults, VERITAS, Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation, Humans, Middle Aged, Spatial Behavior, Male, Motor Activity, Socioeconomic Factors, Feasibility Studies, Patient Selection, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Retrospective Studies, Poverty, Self Report, Wearable Electronic Devices, Pilot Projects, Geographic Information Systems/instrumentation, Aged, Patient Compliance",
author = "Tanja Schmidt and Jacqueline Kerr and Yan Kestens and Jasper Schipperijn",
note = "ER importeret fra PubMed",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/tbm/iby009",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "99--109",
journal = "Transnational Behaviol Medicine",
issn = "1869-6716",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

Challenges in using wearable GPS devices in low-income older adults : Can map-based interviews help with assessments of mobility? / Schmidt, Tanja; Kerr, Jacqueline; Kestens, Yan; Schipperijn, Jasper.

In: Transnational Behaviol Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 1, 15.03.2019, p. 99-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges in using wearable GPS devices in low-income older adults

T2 - Can map-based interviews help with assessments of mobility?

AU - Schmidt, Tanja

AU - Kerr, Jacqueline

AU - Kestens, Yan

AU - Schipperijn, Jasper

N1 - ER importeret fra PubMed

PY - 2019/3/15

Y1 - 2019/3/15

N2 - Daily mobility, defined as the ability to move oneself within one's neighborhood and regions beyond, is an important construct, which affects people as they age. Having a feasible and valid measure of daily mobility is essential to understand how it affects older adults' everyday life. Given the limitations of existing measures, new tools may be needed. The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility and practicality of using the map-based questionnaire system VERITAS and GPS devices to measure daily mobility in older adults living in a deprived neighborhood in Denmark. Older adults were recruited from two senior housing areas, completed an interview using VERITAS and wore a GPS for 7 days. Feasibility of both methods was assessed by looking at practicalities, recruitment and compliance, and ability to measure daily mobility.Thirty-four older adults completed the VERITAS questionnaire, of which 23 wore the GPS device. Remembering to wear and charge the GPS was difficult for 48% participants, whereas remembering street names and drawing routes in VERITAS was difficult for two. Both the GPS and VERITAS were able to measure 10 out of the 13 identified components of mobility; however, VERITAS seemed more qualified at measuring daily mobility for this target population. The feasibility of assessing mobility may vary by specific context and study population being investigated. Wearable technology like a GPS may not be acceptable to low socioeconomic older adults, whereas interview led self-reported measurements like VERITAS might be more suitable for a low socioeconomic elderly population.

AB - Daily mobility, defined as the ability to move oneself within one's neighborhood and regions beyond, is an important construct, which affects people as they age. Having a feasible and valid measure of daily mobility is essential to understand how it affects older adults' everyday life. Given the limitations of existing measures, new tools may be needed. The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility and practicality of using the map-based questionnaire system VERITAS and GPS devices to measure daily mobility in older adults living in a deprived neighborhood in Denmark. Older adults were recruited from two senior housing areas, completed an interview using VERITAS and wore a GPS for 7 days. Feasibility of both methods was assessed by looking at practicalities, recruitment and compliance, and ability to measure daily mobility.Thirty-four older adults completed the VERITAS questionnaire, of which 23 wore the GPS device. Remembering to wear and charge the GPS was difficult for 48% participants, whereas remembering street names and drawing routes in VERITAS was difficult for two. Both the GPS and VERITAS were able to measure 10 out of the 13 identified components of mobility; however, VERITAS seemed more qualified at measuring daily mobility for this target population. The feasibility of assessing mobility may vary by specific context and study population being investigated. Wearable technology like a GPS may not be acceptable to low socioeconomic older adults, whereas interview led self-reported measurements like VERITAS might be more suitable for a low socioeconomic elderly population.

KW - Feasibility

KW - GPS

KW - Low-income community

KW - Older adults

KW - VERITAS

KW - Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation

KW - Humans

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Spatial Behavior

KW - Male

KW - Motor Activity

KW - Socioeconomic Factors

KW - Feasibility Studies

KW - Patient Selection

KW - Activities of Daily Living

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Female

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Poverty

KW - Self Report

KW - Wearable Electronic Devices

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - Geographic Information Systems/instrumentation

KW - Aged

KW - Patient Compliance

U2 - 10.1093/tbm/iby009

DO - 10.1093/tbm/iby009

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 99

EP - 109

JO - Transnational Behaviol Medicine

JF - Transnational Behaviol Medicine

SN - 1869-6716

IS - 1

ER -