Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bridging the Research Gap between Live Collections in Zoos and Preserved Collections in Natural History Museums

  • Sinlan Poo*
  • , Steven M Whitfield
  • , Alexander Shepack
  • , Gregory J Watkins-Colwell
  • , Gil Nelson
  • , Jillian Goodwin
  • , Allison Bogisich
  • , Patricia L R Brennan
  • , Jennifer D'Agostino
  • , Michelle S Koo
  • , Joseph R Mendelson
  • , Rebecca Snyder
  • , Sandra Wilson
  • , Gary P Aronsen
  • , Andrew C Bentley
  • , David C Blackburn
  • , Matthew R Borths
  • , Mariel L Campbell
  • , Dalia A Conde
  • , Joseph A Cook
  • Juan D Daza, Daniel P Dembiec, Jonathan L Dunnum, Catherine M Early, Adam W Ferguson, Amanda Greene, Robert Guralnick, Courtney Janney, Debbie Johnson, Felicia Knightly, Stephane Poulin, Luiz Rocha, Pamela S Soltis, Barbara Thiers, Prosanta Chakrabarty
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Memphis Zoological Society
  • Florida International University
  • University of Notre Dame
  • Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History
  • Florida Museum of Natural History and with iDigBio
  • Mount Holyoke College
  • Oklahoma City Zoo
  • University of California
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Sedgwick County Zoo
  • Yale New Haven Hospital
  • University of Kansas Center
  • Duke Lemur Center
  • Museum of Southwestern Biology
  • Sam Houston State University
  • Science Museum of Minnesota
  • The Field Museum, Chicago
  • Zoo of Brookfield
  • Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum
  • California Academy of Sciences
  • New York Botanical Garden
  • Louisiana State University in Shreveport

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Zoos and natural history museums are both collections-based institutions with important missions in biodiversity research and education. Animals in zoos are a repository and living record of the world's biodiversity, whereas natural history museums are a permanent historical record of snapshots of biodiversity in time. Surprisingly, despite significant overlap in institutional missions, formal partnerships between these institution types are infrequent. Life history information, pedigrees, and medical records maintained at zoos should be seen as complementary to historical records of morphology, genetics, and distribution kept at museums. Through examining both institution types, we synthesize the benefits and challenges of cross-institutional exchanges and propose actions to increase the dialog between zoos and museums. With a growing recognition of the importance of collections to the advancement of scientific research and discovery, a transformational impact could be made with long-term investments in connecting the institutions that are caretakers of living and preserved animals.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBioScience
Volume72
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)449-460
ISSN0006-3568
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging the Research Gap between Live Collections in Zoos and Preserved Collections in Natural History Museums'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this