Better to Grow Up Poor in a Richer Place? Social Housing, Neighbourhood Comparisons, and English Teenagers’ Well-Being

Franco Bonomi Bezzo*, Pieter Vanhuysse

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How does relative deprivation within their neigbourhood affect the lives of teenagers? We use the 2009-2019 Understanding Society youth samples and the 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation to explore this question. We investigate a sample of over 1700 13-to-15-year-olds living in social housing in England, where social housing procedures approximate a form of quasi-exogenous allocation. Investigating a neighbourhood effect at the fine-grained level of Lower Layer Super Output Areas, we study altogether fifteen subdimensions across three domains of self-reported ‘problems’ in these young teenagers’ lives: (a) their sense of generally leading a bad life, (b) conflictual family interactions with their mother and siblings, and (c) unhappy social interactions with their peers. We find that living in social housing within a less deprived neighbourhood does not affect these teenagers’ general sense of leading a bad life, except to reduce their sense of having a bad appearance. Nor does living in a less deprived neighbourhood affect conflict in these teenagers’ family interactions. And it actually makes them less likely to report unhappy social interactions with their peers.
Original languageEnglish
Article number28
JournalJournal of Happiness Studies
Volume25
Issue number3
Number of pages20
ISSN1389-4978
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18. Feb 2024

Keywords

  • youth wellbeing
  • youth behavior
  • Index of Multiple Deprivation
  • Understanding Society survey
  • relative deprivation
  • social justice
  • social comparison
  • generations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Better to Grow Up Poor in a Richer Place? Social Housing, Neighbourhood Comparisons, and English Teenagers’ Well-Being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this