Assessing network technologies for learning

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Use of communication technologies is central to designing for networked learning. This chapter offers a general scheme for thinking critically about technologies employed in networked learning. While not directly treating questions in ethics, the scheme is based on three theories of ethics. It is demonstrated how this scheme can help us think critically about aspects of networked learning: its digital platforms (such as Facebook), one of its institutions (such as a library) and its relevance for making the practice of classroom teaching flourish rather than flounder under the influence of digitally mediated social networks. The first of the three elements in the scheme draws on the ethical theory, consequentialism. This theory evaluates actions according to their outcomes, and stresses that we think carefully about the actual effects of our technologies. The second, based on Illich’s notion of convivial technologies, takes autonomy to be a central concern when thinking about network technologies. The concept of autonomy features as one of the key concepts in deontological approaches to ethics. Finally, we briefly explore Borgmann’s appeal to virtues in his account of focal practices and how they can be either supported or challenged by technologies. In this way, the three dominant ethical theories are brought to bear on examples of networked learning.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDesigning for Learning in a Networked World
    EditorsNina Bonderup Dohn
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherRoutledge
    Publication date2018
    Pages64-78
    Chapter4
    ISBN (Print)978-0-8153-7843-3
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-351-23235-7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018
    SeriesRoutledge Research in Education

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing network technologies for learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this