TY - GEN
T1 - Are We Ready to Evaluate the Smart Readiness of Australian Buildings?
AU - Markoska, Elena
AU - Sethuvenkatraman, Subbu
AU - Jakica, Nebojsa
AU - Lazarova-Molnar, Sanja
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Digital innovation is leading to a greater uptake of smart technologies in the building industry. Smart systems can reduce the built environment carbon footprint, improve occupant productivity and enable buildings to participate in managing the electricity network. However, their deployment poses significant challenges, given the heterogeneity of hardware and software in the building environment. Different research approaches have attempted to quantify the preparedness of buildings to facilitate new technologies that improve their performance, while maintaining occupant comfort and allowing optimal delivery of each building’s particular service. One prominent approach is the European Commission’s Smart Readiness Indicator (SRI). In this paper, we explore how well the SRI applies to Australian buildings by considering a case study building. Our analysis shows that building services need to be carefully chosen to ensure that they are relevant. We therefore advocate adjustment of weighting factors that consider climatic conditions and suitable domains such as heating or cooling. On the basis of our findings, we provide recommendations for adopting the SRI in Australian buildings.
AB - Digital innovation is leading to a greater uptake of smart technologies in the building industry. Smart systems can reduce the built environment carbon footprint, improve occupant productivity and enable buildings to participate in managing the electricity network. However, their deployment poses significant challenges, given the heterogeneity of hardware and software in the building environment. Different research approaches have attempted to quantify the preparedness of buildings to facilitate new technologies that improve their performance, while maintaining occupant comfort and allowing optimal delivery of each building’s particular service. One prominent approach is the European Commission’s Smart Readiness Indicator (SRI). In this paper, we explore how well the SRI applies to Australian buildings by considering a case study building. Our analysis shows that building services need to be carefully chosen to ensure that they are relevant. We therefore advocate adjustment of weighting factors that consider climatic conditions and suitable domains such as heating or cooling. On the basis of our findings, we provide recommendations for adopting the SRI in Australian buildings.
KW - Case study
KW - Smart buildings
KW - Smart Readiness Indicator
U2 - 10.1007/978-981-15-8783-2_46
DO - 10.1007/978-981-15-8783-2_46
M3 - Article in proceedings
AN - SCOPUS:85098166573
SN - 9789811587825
T3 - Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
SP - 549
EP - 559
BT - Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2020
A2 - Littlewood, John
A2 - Howlett, Robert J.
A2 - Jain, Lakhmi C.
PB - Springer
CY - Singapore
T2 - 12th KES International Conference on Sustainability and Energy in Buildings, SEB 2020
Y2 - 24 June 2020 through 26 June 2020
ER -