Are leavers different from stayers?

Dropout and students' perceptions of the teaching-learning environment

Anna Bager-Elsborg, Kim Jesper Herrmann, Rie Troelsen, Lars Ulriksen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Dropout causes are varied, as is the way in which they are researched. In this paper, we study the correlation between student perceptions of the teaching–learning environment and dropping out by investigating the interaction between students and the teaching–learning environment before the students make the decision to stay or leave. Survey data from 4,339 students at a major research-intensive Danish university combined with administrative data were analysed, and the results point to two main differences between stayers and leavers. First, students who later decided to leave university found their courses to be less interesting and less relevant compared to the experience of the students staying, and second, students with a high academic self-efficacy belief are less at risk of dropping out of their university studies. A methodological strength of the study is that student perceptions were measured when the students were all still enrolled. This reduces the risk of the leavers’ perception being affected by their decision to leave.

student retention, teaching–learning environments, interest, self-efficacy beliefs, methodological design
Original languageEnglish
JournalUniped
Volume42
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)139-156
ISSN1500-4538
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

drop-out
learning environment
Teaching
student
self-efficacy
university
cause
interaction

Cite this

Bager-Elsborg, Anna ; Herrmann, Kim Jesper ; Troelsen, Rie ; Ulriksen, Lars. / Are leavers different from stayers? Dropout and students' perceptions of the teaching-learning environment. In: Uniped. 2019 ; Vol. 42, No. 2. pp. 139-156.
@article{c51508f2352743df922e4ca950033b10,
title = "Are leavers different from stayers?: Dropout and students' perceptions of the teaching-learning environment",
abstract = "Dropout causes are varied, as is the way in which they are researched. In this paper, we study the correlation between student perceptions of the teaching–learning environment and dropping out by investigating the interaction between students and the teaching–learning environment before the students make the decision to stay or leave. Survey data from 4,339 students at a major research-intensive Danish university combined with administrative data were analysed, and the results point to two main differences between stayers and leavers. First, students who later decided to leave university found their courses to be less interesting and less relevant compared to the experience of the students staying, and second, students with a high academic self-efficacy belief are less at risk of dropping out of their university studies. A methodological strength of the study is that student perceptions were measured when the students were all still enrolled. This reduces the risk of the leavers’ perception being affected by their decision to leave.student retention, teaching–learning environments, interest, self-efficacy beliefs, methodological design",
keywords = "self-efficacy beliefs, methodological design, student retention, teaching–learning environments, interest",
author = "Anna Bager-Elsborg and Herrmann, {Kim Jesper} and Rie Troelsen and Lars Ulriksen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2019-02-03",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "139--156",
journal = "Uniped",
issn = "1500-4538",
publisher = "Universitetsforlaget",
number = "2",

}

Are leavers different from stayers? Dropout and students' perceptions of the teaching-learning environment. / Bager-Elsborg, Anna; Herrmann, Kim Jesper; Troelsen, Rie; Ulriksen, Lars.

In: Uniped, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2019, p. 139-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are leavers different from stayers?

T2 - Dropout and students' perceptions of the teaching-learning environment

AU - Bager-Elsborg, Anna

AU - Herrmann, Kim Jesper

AU - Troelsen, Rie

AU - Ulriksen, Lars

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Dropout causes are varied, as is the way in which they are researched. In this paper, we study the correlation between student perceptions of the teaching–learning environment and dropping out by investigating the interaction between students and the teaching–learning environment before the students make the decision to stay or leave. Survey data from 4,339 students at a major research-intensive Danish university combined with administrative data were analysed, and the results point to two main differences between stayers and leavers. First, students who later decided to leave university found their courses to be less interesting and less relevant compared to the experience of the students staying, and second, students with a high academic self-efficacy belief are less at risk of dropping out of their university studies. A methodological strength of the study is that student perceptions were measured when the students were all still enrolled. This reduces the risk of the leavers’ perception being affected by their decision to leave.student retention, teaching–learning environments, interest, self-efficacy beliefs, methodological design

AB - Dropout causes are varied, as is the way in which they are researched. In this paper, we study the correlation between student perceptions of the teaching–learning environment and dropping out by investigating the interaction between students and the teaching–learning environment before the students make the decision to stay or leave. Survey data from 4,339 students at a major research-intensive Danish university combined with administrative data were analysed, and the results point to two main differences between stayers and leavers. First, students who later decided to leave university found their courses to be less interesting and less relevant compared to the experience of the students staying, and second, students with a high academic self-efficacy belief are less at risk of dropping out of their university studies. A methodological strength of the study is that student perceptions were measured when the students were all still enrolled. This reduces the risk of the leavers’ perception being affected by their decision to leave.student retention, teaching–learning environments, interest, self-efficacy beliefs, methodological design

KW - self-efficacy beliefs

KW - methodological design

KW - student retention

KW - teaching–learning environments

KW - interest

U2 - 10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2019-02-03

DO - 10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2019-02-03

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 139

EP - 156

JO - Uniped

JF - Uniped

SN - 1500-4538

IS - 2

ER -