TY - JOUR
T1 - Anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge
T2 - comparison of thermal pretreatments with thermal inter-stage treatments
AU - Bangsø Nielsen, Henrik
AU - Thygesen, Anders
AU - Thomsen, Anne Belinda
AU - Schmidt, Jens Ejbye
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - BACKGROUND: Treatment methods for improved anaerobic digestion (AD) of waste activated sludge were evaluated. Pretreatments at moderate thermal (water bath at 80 °C), high thermal (loop autoclave at 130–170 °C) and thermo-chemical (170 °C/pH 10) conditions prior to AD in batch vials (40 days/37 °C) were compared with inter-stage treatments under the same conditions carried out between two separate steps of AD (19–21 days/37 °C). Combined treatment at 80 °C with CO2/ NH3-stripping was also evaluated. RESULTS: Pretreatment at 80 °C had no effect on methane yield while inter-stage treatment gave a 20% increase, compared with controls. Combining inter-stage treatment with CO2/ NH3-stripping gave an increase in pH (7.1 to 9.3), a drop in ammonia-N concentration (910 mg-N to 510 mg-N) and a methane yield improvement of 31%. Pretreatment at 130 °C, 170 °C and 170 °C/pH 10 considerably increased the methane production within the first 4 days but the improvement following 40 days of digestion was only 13%, 9% and 2%, respectively. In comparison, inter-stage treatment led to improvements of 9% (130 °C), 29% (170 °C) and 28% (170 °C/pH 10). All treatment processes increased sludge solubilization. CONCLUSION: Thermal treatment of waste activated sludge for improved anaerobic digestion seems more effective when applied as an inter-stage treatment rather than a pretreatment. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry
AB - BACKGROUND: Treatment methods for improved anaerobic digestion (AD) of waste activated sludge were evaluated. Pretreatments at moderate thermal (water bath at 80 °C), high thermal (loop autoclave at 130–170 °C) and thermo-chemical (170 °C/pH 10) conditions prior to AD in batch vials (40 days/37 °C) were compared with inter-stage treatments under the same conditions carried out between two separate steps of AD (19–21 days/37 °C). Combined treatment at 80 °C with CO2/ NH3-stripping was also evaluated. RESULTS: Pretreatment at 80 °C had no effect on methane yield while inter-stage treatment gave a 20% increase, compared with controls. Combining inter-stage treatment with CO2/ NH3-stripping gave an increase in pH (7.1 to 9.3), a drop in ammonia-N concentration (910 mg-N to 510 mg-N) and a methane yield improvement of 31%. Pretreatment at 130 °C, 170 °C and 170 °C/pH 10 considerably increased the methane production within the first 4 days but the improvement following 40 days of digestion was only 13%, 9% and 2%, respectively. In comparison, inter-stage treatment led to improvements of 9% (130 °C), 29% (170 °C) and 28% (170 °C/pH 10). All treatment processes increased sludge solubilization. CONCLUSION: Thermal treatment of waste activated sludge for improved anaerobic digestion seems more effective when applied as an inter-stage treatment rather than a pretreatment. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry
KW - Bio refinery
KW - Bio systems
KW - Bioraffinaderi
KW - Biosystemer
U2 - 10.1002/jctb.2509
DO - 10.1002/jctb.2509
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
SN - 0268-2575
VL - 86
SP - 238
EP - 245
JO - Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology
JF - Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology
IS - 2
ER -