Abstract
Objective. To evaluate amiodarone prophylaxis in diabetics and non-diabetics. Further to clarify whether the risk of developing atrial fibrillation is higher for diabetics than non-diabetic patients, and to evaluate whether the diabetic status has any influence on the length of in-hospital stay. Design. Subgroup analysis within a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. Results. At 30 days of follow-up atrial fibrillation was equally frequent among diabetics (22%) and non-diabetics (17%) (p =0.41). The length of in-hospital stay for diabetics was prolonged with 25% (9%; 45%). The prophylactic amiodarone was found equally efficient in diabetics and non-diabetics, as the relative risk ratios were 1.2 (0.4-5.4) and 2.0 (0.3-12.5), respectively. Conclusions. Diabetics and non-diabetics had the same effect of the amiodarone prophylaxis regime. Atrial fibrillation developed equally among diabetics and non-diabetics, but the length of stay was prolonged for diabetics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 173-177 |
| ISSN | 1401-7431 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1. Jul 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Amiodarone protects diabetics and non-diabetics undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting equally'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver