Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the alliance strategy in an Online Retailing Supply Chain (ORSC). Three alliance models in addition to one no alliance model is built and examined. The no alliance model as a benchmark is developed to characterize the alliance motivation for each supply chain member. Afterwards, we identify the optimal alliance strategy and the final alliance equilibrium. The results show that the manufacturer always has motivations to form an alliance with each of other two members, while the retailer and the platform may form an alliance only when the agency rate is relatively low. Moreover, under certain conditions, all supply chain members could achieve a win-win-win result in the manufacturer-retailer and manufacturer-platform alliance models, but fall into a lose-lose-lose situation in the retailer-platform alliance model. Additionally, it is interesting that a higher agency rate makes the retailer more profitable when the platform and manufacturer enter into an alliance. Finally, we find that each of the three alliance models may be the final equilibrium, which is largely dependent on channel competition and the agency rate.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102791
JournalOmega (United Kingdom)
Volume115
Number of pages15
ISSN0305-0483
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Agency selling
  • Alliance strategy
  • Game theory
  • Online retailing
  • Reselling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alliance strategy in an online retailing supply chain: Motivation, choice, and equilibrium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this