Age- and Sex-differences in the Validity of Questionnaire-based Zygosity in Twins

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


Questionnaire-based zygosity assessment in twins has generally been found to be valid. In this report we evaluate sex- and age-differences in the validity of such questionnaire-based classification when using the four questions that have been the basis of zygosity assessment in The Danish Twin Registry for half a century. Three hundred and forty-two male and 531 female twin pairs were zygosity diagnosed using genetic markers and the results compared with the original questionnaire based classification. We found significant differences in the accuracy of questionnaire based zygosity diagnosis when stratifying the data for sex as well as age: males and monozygotic having the highest misclassification. However, even in the group with the highest misclassification rate the frequency was less than 8%. The overall misclassification rate was only 4%, with a clear tendency towards a higher proportion of misclassified monozygotic than dizygotic twins. The results demonstrate that questionnaire based zygosity diagnosis can still be regarded as a valid and valuable classification method for most purposes.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTwin research
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)275-278
Publication statusPublished - 2003


Dive into the research topics of 'Age- and Sex-differences in the Validity of Questionnaire-based Zygosity in Twins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this