Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


    The inevitable need for rationing of healthcare has apparently presented the medical profession with the dilemma of choosing the lesser of two evils. Physicians appear to be obliged to adopt either an implausible version of traditional professional ethics or an equally problematic ethics of bedside rationing. The former requires unrestricted advocacy of patients but prompts distrust, moral hazard and unfairness. The latter commits physicians to rationing at the bedside; but it is bound to introduce unfair inequalities among patients and lack of political accountability towards citizens. In this paper I shall argue that this dilemma is false, since a third intermediate alternative exists. This alternative, which I term 'administrative gatekeeping', makes it possible for physicians to be involved in rationing while at the same time being genuine advocates of their patients. According to this ideal, physicians are required to follow fair rules of rationing adopted at higher organizational levels within healthcare systems. At the same time, however, they are prohibited from including considerations of cost in their clinical decisions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Issue number5
    Pages (from-to)311-20
    Number of pages10
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009


    • Conflict (Psychology)
    • Cost-Benefit Analysis/ethics
    • Decision Making/ethics
    • Ethical Analysis
    • Gatekeeping/ethics
    • Health Care Rationing/ethics
    • Health Services Accessibility/ethics
    • Healthcare Disparities/ethics
    • Humans
    • Moral Obligations
    • Patient Advocacy/ethics
    • Philosophy, Medical
    • Physician's Role
    • Physician-Patient Relations/ethics
    • Politics
    • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
    • Social Justice/ethics
    • Trust


    Dive into the research topics of 'Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this