Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity at Work and Need for Recovery: A Compositional Analysis of Cross-sectional Data

Matthew L. Stevens, Patrick Crowley, Charlotte L. Rasmussen, David M. Hallman, Ole S. Mortensen, Clas Håkan Nygård, Andreas Holtermann

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous research has shown strong associations between occupational physical activity (OPA) and need for recovery (NFR). However this research has only utilized self-reported measures of OPA which may be biased. Thus, there is a need for investigating if the previously documented association between self-reported OPA and NFR can be found when using technical measures of OPA. There is also the need to investigate whether older workers are particularly susceptible to increased NFR, since age-related declines in physical capacity mean that it is likely these workers will have a higher NFR for a given physical activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between technically measured OPA and NFR, and whether this relationship is modified by age. METHODS: This study utilized data from the Danish Physical Activity Cohort with Objective Measurements cohort-comprising Danish workers (n = 840) from the cleaning, manufacturing, and transportation sectors. OPA was measured by accelerometers attached to the thigh and upper back for at least one work day and classified into four physical behaviour categories (sedentary, standing, light, or moderate/vigorous). NFR was measured using a shortened version of the Danish NFR scale. Analysis was conducted using linear regression and isotemporal substitution analyses for compositional data. RESULTS: The overall association between OPA and NFR was statistically significant in the unadjusted model (P < 0.001), but not when adjusted for age, sex, occupation, and shift work (P = 0.166). Isotemporal substitution showed small but significant reductions in NFR when increasing sedentary time relative to other behaviours (adjusted: ΔNFR = -0.010 [-0.019; -0.001]). There were no significant interactions between age and OPA (P = 0.409). CONCLUSIONS: This study found significant associations between OPA and NFR, but the effect sizes were small. Reallocating 30 min to sedentary behaviours from other behaviours was associated with a reduced NFR, but the effect size may not be practically relevant. Moreover, no clear modifying effects of age were identified.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of Work Exposures and Health
Volume64
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)138-151
ISSN2398-7308
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20. Feb 2020

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • blue-collar workers
  • compositional data analysis
  • need for recovery
  • physical activity
  • physical behaviour
  • triaxial accelerometers

Cite this