A perspective on muscle phenotyping in musculoskeletal research

Ines Foessl*, Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell, Erika Kague, Faidra Laskou, Franz Jakob, David Karasik, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch, Co-authors, Neha Sharma (Member of author group), Kent Søe (Member of author group)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Musculoskeletal research should synergistically investigate bone and muscle to inform approaches for maintaining mobility and to avoid bone fractures. The relationship between sarcopenia and osteoporosis, integrated in the term ‘osteosarcopenia’, is underscored by the close association shown between these two conditions in many studies, whereby one entity emerges as a predictor of the other. In a recent workshop of Working Group (WG) 2 of the EU Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action ‘Genomics of MusculoSkeletal traits Translational Network’ (GEMSTONE) consortium (CA18139), muscle characterization was highlighted as being important, but currently under-recognized in the musculoskeletal field. Here, we summarize the opinions of the Consortium and research questions around translational and clinical musculoskeletal research, discussing muscle phenotyping in human experimental research and in two animal models: zebrafish and mouse.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTrends in Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume35
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)478-489
ISSN1043-2760
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • animal models
  • muscle
  • musculoskeletal phenotyping
  • sarcopenia
  • Humans
  • Osteoporosis/metabolism
  • Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism
  • Zebrafish
  • Sarcopenia/metabolism
  • Phenotype
  • Animals
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases/physiopathology
  • Mice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A perspective on muscle phenotyping in musculoskeletal research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this