Abstract
In 1956, the British Ministry of Health instituted a vaccination programme against poliomyelitis, but run into myriad supply and administrative issues. When Coventry experienced an epidemic in 1957, it came to symbolise these problems. Throughout, it was claimed that the government lacked ‘common sense’. This article explores how and why ‘common sense’ was used as a rhetorical weapon in the debates over policy at the local and national level. While those claiming ‘common sense’ were often at odds with medical and administrative authorities, the arguments were often informed by deeply held beliefs about vaccination and disease.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Contemporary British History |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 384-406 |
| ISSN | 1361-9462 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3. Jul 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Funding
Wellcome Trust Investigator Award, held by Alex Mold. [grant number WT-100586-Z-12-Z]. The author would like to thank Alex Mold, Harriet Palfreyman, Martin Moore and Dora Vargha for their notes and feedback on earlier drafts of this article.
Keywords
- media
- medicine
- policy
- public health
- Vaccination
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘A matter of commonsense’: the Coventry poliomyelitis epidemic 1957 and the British public'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver