A guide to evaluating systematic reviews for the busy clinicians or reluctant readers

Stanley Innes*, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Systematic reviews (SRs) provide a solution to handle information overload for busy clinicians by summarising and synthesizing studies on a specific issue. However, because SRs are complicated and often boring to read, the busy or reluctant reader may make do with the abstract. When, as it has been shown, many authors overstate efficacy or understate harm in their abstracts, not consulting the underlying article could be misleading. This means that the prudent reader must have the ability to identify the ‘tender points’ of SRs to avoid falling for ‘spin’. To this end we briefly review the method of SRs and ways to relatively quickly determine trustworthiness.

Original languageEnglish
Article number38
JournalChiropractic and Manual Therapies
Volume31
Number of pages6
ISSN2045-709X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20. Sept 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Chiropractic and Osteopathic College of Australasia, European Academy of Chiropractic, The Royal College of Chiropractors, Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics and BioMed Central Ltd.

Keywords

  • Evaluation studies
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Health personnel
  • Information literacy
  • Systematic review
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A guide to evaluating systematic reviews for the busy clinicians or reluctant readers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this