Project Details
Description
Reasoning is at the core of many cognitive systems and relevant for artificial intelligence and cognitive science. To develop a cognitive reasoning framework (e.g., for a cognitive agent) we need to have a cognitive theory and model that adequately reflects human reasoning. However, today a great variety of competing psychological reasoning theories exists. Recently a meta-analysis of syllogistic reasoning theories revealed that all of them significantly deviate from human data.To develop a comprehensive cognitive theory, a formal and computational assessment of existing theories is necessary. This is challenging since most theories are only informally described, they are restricted to a specific domain and level of analysis (i.e., behavioral, algorithmic, or neural level), and no general benchmark set exists.A comprehensive analysis of reasoning theories requires a multi-methodological approach combining techniques from artificial intelligence like cognitive modeling and knowledge representation and reasoning with empirical investigations. Recently developed multinomial processing tree models enable a quantitative comparison of different reasoning theories. Cognitive architectures allow for an additional integration of working memory and connect symbolic theories to fMRI-findings.The objective of this project is such a computational analysis of reasoning theories and to define and implement a comprehensive and domain-independent neuro-cognitive theory of human deductive reasoning. This requires (i) a thorough formal and algorithmic analysis and implementationt o make cognitive theories usable and to analyze their predictive power, (ii) an assessment of theories considering a uniform benchmark set and different levels of analysis (behavioral, algorithmic, and neural); and (iii) extracting common factors about mental representations and operations towards a comprehensive theory of neuro-cognitive reasoning. Such a formal and algorithmic approach makes the theory readily available for building cognitive agents that can interact naturally with humans in reasoning processes.
| Status | Finished |
|---|---|
| Effective start/end date | 01/08/2016 → 31/07/2021 |
Fingerprint
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
-
Predictive modeling of individual human cognition: Upper bounds and a new perspective on performance
Riesterer, N., Brand, D. & Ragni, M., Jul 2020, In: Topics in Cognitive Science. 12, 3, p. 960-974Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Open AccessFile115 Downloads (Pure) -
Reasoning about epistemic possibilities
Ragni, M. & Johnson-Laird, P. N., Jul 2020, In: Acta Psychologica. 208, 103081.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
The neurocognitive correlates of human reasoning: A meta-analysis of conditional and syllogistic inferences
Wertheim, J. & Ragni, M., Jun 2020, In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 32, 6, p. 1061-1078Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Open AccessFile615 Downloads (Pure) -
Modeling human syllogistic reasoning: The role of "No valid conclusion"
Riesterer, N., Brandt, D., Dames, H. & Ragni, M., 2019, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Goel, A., Seifert, C. & Freksa, C. (eds.). Cognitive Science Society, p. 953-959Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Open Access